Does the environmental context of a signalling male influence his attractiveness?

How sexually selected male signals and female sensory systems have evolved so that females can continue to detect and discriminate between potential mates in the face of environmental noise and changes in signaller density has been well studied for acoustic signals. Far less is known about visual signals. We examined the influence of the local signalling environment on male signal attractiveness in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi. We used custom-built robotic crabs in two-stimulus mate choice experiments. Females were presented with two identical signals produced in two different signalling environments (simple and complex). The conspicuousness/attractiveness of male claw waving was unaffected by the local environment (physical or social). Male U. mjoebergi appear to produce a signal that is highly conspicuous across a wide range of naturally occurring signalling environments and females seem to have a sensory system that is capable of coping with high levels of environmental noise.

[1]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  J. Endler.  On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[3]  J. Christy.  Female choice in the resource-defense mating system of the sand fiddler crab, Uca pugilator , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Signal Detection and Animal Communication , 2006 .

[5]  M. Servedio,et al.  MICROHABITAT VARIATION AND SEXUAL SELECTION CAN MAINTAIN MALE COLOR POLYMORPHISMS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  W. R. Rhodes.  Fiddler crabs of the world, ocypodidae: Genus Uca By Jocelyn Crane. Princeton University Press (1975). Pp. xxiii + 736. $75 , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  T. Cronin,et al.  The visual pigments of crabs , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  M. Ryan.  Sensory Ecology: See Me, Hear Me , 2007, Current Biology.

[9]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the design of animal signals , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[11]  M. Leal,et al.  Evidence for habitat partitioning based on adaptation to environmental light in a pair of sympatric lizard species , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  M. Salmon.  The courtship, aggression and mating system of a “primitive” fiddler crab (Uca vocans: Ocypodidae) , 1984 .

[13]  J. Endler.  Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[15]  J. Endler.  Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Lori Wollerman.  Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  J. Crane.  Fiddler Crabs of the World , 1976 .

[18]  P. Backwell,et al.  Temporal constraints and female preference for burrow width in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  M. Whiting,et al.  Natural Selection on Social Signals: Signal Efficacy and the Evolution of Chameleon Display Coloration , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[20]  LORI WOLLERMAN,et al.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frogHyla ebraccata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[22]  Hans Winkler,et al.  Vertical lek placement of forest-dwelling manakin species (Aves, Pipridae) is associated with vertical gradients of ambient light , 2003 .

[23]  J. Rydell,et al.  Light, predation and the lekking behaviour of the ghost swift Hepialus humuli (L.) (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  T. Detto.  The fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi uses colour vision in mate choice , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  P. Backwell,et al.  Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab , 2007 .

[26]  P. Backwell,et al.  Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 2008, Current Biology.

[27]  J. Christy.  Pillar function in the fiddler crab Uca beebei (II): competitive courtship signaling , 2010 .

[28]  R. Peters,et al.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Swaddle,et al.  High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  P. Backwell,et al.  Can beggars be choosers? Male mate choice in a fiddler crab , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration? , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  H. Winkler,et al.  Interacting effects of ambient light and plumage color patterns in displaying Wire-tailed Manakins (Aves, Pipridae) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning , 2005 .

[34]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of four species of fiddler crabs (Uca pugnax, Uca pugilator, Uca vomeris and Uca tangeri) measured by in situ microspectrophotometry , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[36]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[37]  D. Mennill,et al.  The Evolution of Signal Design in Manakin Plumage Ornaments , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[38]  T. Hetherington,et al.  Field Studies on Visual and Acoustic Signaling in the "Earless" Panamanian Golden Frog, Atelopus zeteki , 1996 .

[39]  R. Fuller.  Lighting environment predicts the relative abundance of male colour morphs in bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) populations , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  M. Nobbs.  Effects of vegetation differ among three species of fiddler crabs (Uca spp.) , 2003 .

[41]  J. Endler,et al.  Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays , 2004 .

[42]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  M. Théry,et al.  Influence of ambient light on the evolution of colour signals: comparative analysis of a Neotropical rainforest bird community , 2004 .

[45]  John M C Hutchinson,et al.  Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.