Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the obstructive interval and the presence of a sperm granuloma on vas patency and pregnancy rate following vasectomy reversal. We identified 334 patients with complete follow-up who met the inclusion criteria. There were significant associations between the obstructive interval and procedure performed as well as with patient age. Patients with longer obstructive intervals were more often older (p < 0.001) and more likely to have a vaseoepididymostomy performed (p < 0.001). There was no association between the presence of a sperm granuloma or the length of the obstructive interval with post-operative vas patency and pregnancy rates. The only independent predictor of post-operative fertility was age of the female partner (p = 0.015). Our data clearly demonstrates that when state of the art surgical techniques are used, neither the presence of a sperm granuloma nor the obstructive interval serve as prognosticators of post-operative vas patency and pregnancy rates. However, when counselling patients and their female partners, it is of utmost importance to stress that the age of the female partner is an independent predictor of successful vasectomy reversal.

[1]  Stéphane Bolduc,et al.  Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[2]  K. Miller,et al.  Prognostic value of intraoperative parameters observed during vasectomy reversal for predicting postoperative vas patency and fertility , 2009, World journal of urology.

[3]  S. Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Fertility Rates following Vasectomy Reversal: Importance of Age of the Female Partner , 2008, Urologia Internationalis.

[4]  W. Kempinas,et al.  Effects of altered epididymal sperm transit time on sperm quality. , 2008, International journal of andrology.

[5]  Philip S Li,et al.  Innovative single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. , 2007, Urology.

[6]  Philip S Li,et al.  Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[7]  S. Silber,et al.  Microscopic vasectomy reversal 30 years later: a summary of 4010 cases by the same surgeon. , 2004, Journal of andrology.

[8]  H. Son,et al.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[9]  J. Burns,et al.  Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia. , 2003, Journal of andrology.

[10]  H. Nagler,et al.  Predictive parameters for microsurgical reconstruction. , 2002, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[11]  H. Guess,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  I. Sharlip What is the best pregnancy rate that may be expected from vasectomy reversal? , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[13]  I. Sharlip,et al.  Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. , 1991, Journal of urological nursing.

[14]  H. Lee A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[15]  S. Silber Epididymal extravasation following vasectomy as a cause for failure of vasectomy reversal. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  S. Silber Microscopic vasectomy reversal. , 1977, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  S. Silber SPERM GRANULOMA AND REVERSIBILITY OF VASECTOMY , 1977, The Lancet.

[18]  S. Howards,et al.  Intratubular hydrostatic pressure in testis and epididymis before and after vasectomy. , 1975, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  S. Boorjian,et al.  The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[20]  L. Lipshultz Vasectomy reversal-predicting outcomes. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[21]  S. Mcdonald,et al.  Observations on multiple sperm granulomas in the rat epididymis following vasectomy , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[22]  B. Schwartz Letter: Ondine's curse. , 1976, Lancet.