Pragmatic Aspects of Communication in Brain-Damaged Patients**We wish to acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke (M 11408), the Veterans Administration and Harvard Project Zero.

Publisher Summary This chapter analyzes pragmatic aspects of communication in brain-damaged patients. It considers several aspects of communication in brain-damaged patients. The survey of the vehicles of communication reveals that the aphasics show some preserved use of intonation but only a modest use of gesture. Intonation serves a stronger communicative function for these patients than do gesture. While the role of gesture in the right-hemisphere patients is unclear, it is known that certain tasks involving intonation pose problems for them. At least for normal speakers, it might be inferred that the right hemisphere is, to some extent, involved in the propositional facets of intonation. Broca's aphasics are generally able to make clear reference but rely largely on cues from their conversants or from items in the surrounding environment. Wernicke's aphasics are less likely to adopt such strategies and, while they may verbally or even gesturally express objects or actions, they are less successful at coherently communicating clear ideas about these referents.

[1]  N. Varney,et al.  Linguistic correlates of pantomime recognition in aphasic patients. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[3]  E. Zurif,et al.  The effects of focal brain damage on pragmatic expression. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[4]  W. Cooper,et al.  Fundamental frequency (F0) attributes in the speech of Wernicke's aphasics , 1979 .

[5]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Comprehension of symbolic gestures in aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[6]  D. Kimura,et al.  Manual activity during speaking. II. Left-handers. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[8]  E. Kaplan,et al.  DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  H. Gardner,et al.  Comprehension and appreciation of humorous material following brain damage. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Wiener,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication , 1972 .

[11]  L. Gerstman,et al.  The perception of emotionally toned sentences by right hemisphere-damaged and aphasic subjects , 1976, Brain and Language.

[12]  J. Duffy,et al.  Pantomime recognition in aphasics. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  A. Wechsler The effect of organic brain disease on recall of emotionally charged versus neutral narrative texts , 1973, Neurology.

[14]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. , 1979, Archives of neurology.

[15]  K M Heilman,et al.  Auditory affective agnosia. Disturbed comprehension of affective speech. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Hemispheric processing of intonation contours. , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[17]  M. Linden,et al.  Pantomime interpretation and aphasia , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Identification of Consonants and Vowels Presented to Left and Right Ears* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Albert,et al.  Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. , 1973, Archives of neurology.

[20]  H. H. Clark Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  K. Poeck,et al.  Text comprehension in aphasia , 1977, Brain and Language.

[22]  E. Bates INTENTIONS, CONVENTIONS, AND SYMBOLS , 1979 .

[23]  H. Grice Utterer's meaning and intentions , 1969 .

[24]  P. Prinz A note on requesting strategies in adult aphasics. , 1980, Journal of communication disorders.

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[26]  Tay Ml A MEASUREMENT OF FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION IN APHASIA. , 1965 .

[27]  H. Gardner,et al.  9 – Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials1 , 1983 .

[28]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[29]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  K. Heilman,et al.  Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease , 1977, Neurology.

[31]  L. Leonard,et al.  Aphasics' comprehension of contextually conveyed meaning , 1978, Brain and Language.

[32]  H. Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to Emotional Expressions and Situations in Organic Patients , 1980, Cortex.

[33]  John R. Searle SPEECH ACTS AND RECENT LINGUISTICS * , 1975 .

[34]  F. Boller,et al.  Paralinguistic aspects of auditory comprehension in aphasia , 1979, Brain and Language.

[35]  G. Gainotti Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of the lesion. , 1972, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[36]  S. Chester,et al.  Nonverbal communication and aphasia therapy. , 1974, Rehabilitation literature.

[37]  Edgar Zurif,et al.  The relation between gesture and language in aphasic communication , 1979, Brain and Language.

[38]  D. Kimura,et al.  Manual activity during speaking. I. Right-handers. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  F. Boller,et al.  Features of auditory comprehension in severely impaired aphasics. , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.