A Method for Emerging Technology Evaluation. Application to Blockchain and Smart Data Discovery

Emerging technologies represent a major innovation that offers significant advances to both private and public organizations. Examples of these technologies are the “Blockchain technology” which combines cryptographic mechanisms and peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture and “Smart Data Discovery” combining artificial intelligence and analytics. The importance of these emerging technologies requires the use of evalua-tion methods in order to understand their contribution and the associat-ed risks. The objective of this article is to propose a method supporting the evaluation of emerging technologies. A guidance approach is pro-posed. It is based on the recognition that emerging technologies are complex systems. Our approach combines three conceptual frame-works: the underlying theory of complex information systems, systems theory, and the ISO 25001 standard devoted to software quality. We propose a multi-criteria hierarchy which serves as the basis for the eval-uation. To illustrate this approach, we apply it to the particular cases of “Blockchain” technology and “Smart Data Discovery”.

[1]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Measures of complexity: a nonexhaustive list , 2001 .

[2]  Charles L. Owen Evaluation of complex systems , 2007 .

[3]  Alan W. Wilhite,et al.  Estimating the Risk of Technology Development , 2006 .

[4]  Leon Pretorius,et al.  The use of bibliometrics in the development of technology roadmaps: Planning for industrial impact of emerging technologies , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE).

[5]  Song Guo,et al.  A Survey on Energy Internet: Architecture, Approach, and Emerging Technologies , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[6]  Huang Lucheng,et al.  Evaluation on the Industrialization Potential of Emerging Technologies Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis , 2010, 2010 12th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation.

[7]  Kim Wikström,et al.  Defining uncertainty in projects – a new perspective , 2008 .

[8]  George S. Day,et al.  Wharton on Managing Emerging Technologies , 2000 .

[9]  Sven Overhage,et al.  New Vistas for Firefighter Information Systems? Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Emerging Technologies from a Task-Technology Fit Perspective , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[10]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Emerging Technology , 2001 .

[11]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[12]  C. Emmeche,et al.  EXPLAINING EMERGENCE: TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LEVELS , 1997 .

[13]  Radu Calinescu,et al.  Large-scale complex IT systems , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[14]  Gerald Adlbrecht,et al.  On Faith, Fact, and Interaction in Projects , 2008 .

[15]  Aliza Sarlan,et al.  Review on critical factors of adopting cloud mobile learning , 2015, 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET).

[16]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  A Scenario-Based Assessment Model—SBAM , 2007 .

[17]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment , 2008 .

[18]  John H. Holland,et al.  Studying Complex Adaptive Systems , 2006, J. Syst. Sci. Complex..