Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level

This study explores the process of organizational change by examining localized social learning in organizational subunits. Specifically, we examine participation in university technology transfer, a new organizational initiative, by tracking 1,780 faculty members, examining their backgrounds and work environments, and following their engagement with academic entrepreneurship. We find that individual adoption of the new initiative may be either substantive or symbolic. Our results suggest that individual attributes, while important, are conditioned by the local work environment. In terms of personal attributes, individuals are more likely to participate if they trained at institutions that had accepted the new initiative and been active in technology transfer. In addition, we find that the longer the time that had elapsed since graduate training, the less likely the individual was to actively embrace the new commercialization norm. Considering the localized social environment, we find that when the chair of the department is active in technology transfer, other members of the department are also likely to participate, if only for symbolic reasons. We also find that technology transfer behavior is calibrated by the experience of those in the relevant cohort. If an individual can observe others with whom they identify engaging in the new initiative, then they are more likely to follow with substantive compliance. Finally, when individuals face dissonance, a situation where their individual training norms are not congruent with the localized social norms in their work environment, they will conform to the local norms, rather than adhering to the norms from their prior experience.

[1]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[2]  R. Gephart The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking , 1993 .

[3]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[6]  H. Etzkowitz The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[7]  C A Nathanson,et al.  Professional norms, personal attitudes, and medical practice: the case of abortion. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[8]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[9]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[10]  Stanley G. Harris,et al.  Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-Based Perspective , 1994 .

[11]  P. Haas Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination , 1992, International Organization.

[12]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Radical Organizational Change , 2006 .

[13]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, , 1994 .

[14]  R. Geiger Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[15]  Jerome A. Katz Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth , 1998 .

[16]  B. Sampat,et al.  University patenting : an assessment of the causes and consequences of recent changes in strategies and practices , 2002 .

[17]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  A. Koestler The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[19]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University , 2004 .

[20]  Judith R. Gordon,et al.  Strengthening Organizational Change Processes , 2003 .

[21]  Scott Frickel,et al.  The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power , 2006 .

[22]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[23]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[24]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Crime and Social Interactions , 1995 .

[25]  Emmanuel Okechukwu Ogbonna,et al.  Managing Organizational Culture: Compliance or Genuine Change? , 1998 .

[26]  D. Cartwright Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. , 1979 .

[27]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development: Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125 (Summer 1992) , 1992 .

[28]  Robert A. Lowe,et al.  Overoptimism and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[30]  W. Mischel,et al.  A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[32]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[33]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant High-Growth Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[34]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[35]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[36]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[37]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[38]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  What's the BIG Idea? (A) , 2001 .

[39]  Simcha Jong,et al.  How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry , 2006 .

[40]  M. Alvesson,et al.  On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies , 1992 .

[41]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[42]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[43]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation , 1993 .

[44]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Social Learning , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[45]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[46]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[47]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[48]  Ashley J. Stevens Autm Licensing Survey: Fy 2002 , 2003 .

[49]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Science in the private interest: has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? , 2006, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[50]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[52]  Glen Biglaiser Guardians of the nation? : economists, generals, and economic reform in Latin America , 2002 .

[53]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective , 1997 .

[54]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[55]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[56]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[57]  James G. Hunt,et al.  Leadership: The Cutting Edge. , 1979 .

[58]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. , 1978 .

[60]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[61]  R. Dahlstrom,et al.  Role Stress and Effectiveness in Horizontal Alliances , 2002 .

[62]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[63]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[64]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Modelling the Origins of Nationally-Bound Administrative Heritages: A Historical Institutional Analysis of French and British Firms , 1997 .

[65]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[66]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[68]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[69]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[70]  William A. Brock,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions , 2001 .

[71]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[72]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .

[73]  Robert S. Sullivan,et al.  Aligning individual and organisational values to support change , 2001 .

[74]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[75]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[76]  N. Wiley,et al.  The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory , 1988 .

[77]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[78]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  The Disclosure and Licensing of University Inventions , 2003 .

[79]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[80]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues' Choices , 2000 .

[81]  James G. Hunt,et al.  Leadership : the cutting edge : a symposium held at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, October 27-28, 1976 , 1977 .

[82]  Monica C. Higgins Follow the Leader? , 2001 .

[83]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[84]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[85]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[86]  J. Balogun,et al.  FROM INTENDED STRATEGIES TO UNINTENDED OUTCOMES: THE IMPACT OF CHANGE RECIPIENT SENSEMAKING. , 2001 .

[87]  Joyce L. Shields,et al.  Transforming Organizations , 1999, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[88]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[89]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm , 1995 .

[90]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[91]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[92]  Fatma Abdellah,et al.  Communication : La diagnosticité/accessibilité du concept pays d'origine (PO) et son effet sur le processus d'évaluation du produit , 2003 .

[93]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Executive Migration and Institutional Change , 2002 .

[94]  Alan T. Sorensen Social Learning in the Demand for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance , 2001 .

[95]  Prithviraj Chattopadhyay,et al.  Determinants of Executive Beliefs: Comparing Functional Conditioning and Social Influence , 1999 .

[96]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[97]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[98]  Arnaldo Momigliano,et al.  The introduction of the teaching of history as an academic subject and its implications , 1983 .

[99]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[100]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International Norm Dynamics and Political Change , 1998, International Organization.

[101]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[102]  Laurel Smith-Doerr Learning to reflect or deflect? : US policies and graduate programs' ethics training for life scientists , 2006 .

[103]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View , 1985 .

[104]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities , 2001 .

[105]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: the impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science ☆ , 2003 .

[106]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[107]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[108]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[109]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[110]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[111]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[112]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[113]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Perspectives on Innovation , 2007 .

[114]  H. Etzkowitz Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[115]  N. Ryder The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[116]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[117]  L. Festinger Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[118]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Academic entrepreneurs and technology transfer: Who participates and why? , 2007 .

[119]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[120]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Reprinted Article Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT , 2009 .

[121]  David C. Mowery,et al.  University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925–1980 , 2001 .