Understanding reasons for drug use amongst young people: a functional perspective.

This study uses a functional perspective to examine the reasons young people cite for using psychoactive substances. The study sample comprised 364 young poly-drug users recruited using snowball-sampling methods. Data on life-time and recent frequency and intensity of use for alcohol, cannabis, amphetamines, ecstasy, LSD and cocaine are presented. A majority of the participants had used at least one of these six drugs to fulfil 11 of 18 measured substance use functions. The most popular functions for use were using to: relax (96.7%), become intoxicated (96.4%), keep awake at night while socializing (95.9%), enhance an activity (88.5%) and alleviate depressed mood (86.8%). Substance use functions were found to differ by age and gender. Recognition of the functions fulfilled by substance use should help health educators and prevention strategists to make health messages about drugs more relevant and appropriate to general and specific audiences. Targeting substances that are perceived to fulfil similar functions and addressing issues concerning the substitution of one substance for another may also strengthen education and prevention efforts.

[1]  J. Peto,et al.  Motivation for drinking among men: survey of a London suburb , 1972, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  B. Cato Youth's Recreation and Drug Sensations: Is There a Relationship? , 1992, Journal of drug education.

[3]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1998. Volume I: Secondary School Students. , 1999 .

[4]  C. Wibberley,et al.  Patterns of Psycho-Stimulant Drug use Amongst ‘Social/Operational Users’: Implications for Services , 2000 .

[5]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Pathways from Heroin Addiction: Recovery Without Treatment , 1986 .

[6]  J. Fountain,et al.  Substance use among young people: the relationship between perceived functions and intentions. , 1999, Addiction.

[7]  Sadava Sw Research approaches in illicit drug use: a critical review. , 1975 .

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cognitive motivations for drug use among adolescents: Longitudinal tests of gender differences and predictors of change in drug use. , 1988 .

[9]  Malcolm Ramsay,et al.  Drug misuse declared in 2000: results from the British Crime Survey , 2001 .

[10]  E. Gunderson,et al.  Motivational determinants of illicit drug use: an assessment of underlying dimensions and their relationship to behavior. , 1981, The International journal of the addictions.

[11]  van Meter Km Methodological and design issues: techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples. , 1990 .

[12]  J. McKay,et al.  Incarcerated adolescents' attributions for drug and alcohol use. , 1992, Addictive behaviors.

[13]  J. Fountain,et al.  What Influences Young People's Use of Drugs? A qualitative study of decision-making , 1999 .

[14]  B Powis,et al.  Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues. , 1993, Addiction.

[15]  T. Power,et al.  Attitudes and Experience of Drug Use Amongst a Group of London Teenagers , 1996 .

[16]  European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union, Portugal, 1997 , 1998 .

[17]  R. Power A Model for Qualitative Action Research Amongst Illicit Drug Users , 1995 .

[18]  S. Lenton,et al.  Raves, drugs and experience: drug use by a sample of people who attend raves in Western Australia. , 1997, Addiction.

[19]  M. Farrell,et al.  The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. , 1998, Addiction.

[20]  R S Carman Motivations for drug use and problematic outcomes among rural junior high school students. , 1979, Addictive behaviors.

[21]  Karl M. van Meter,et al.  Methodological and design issues: techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples. , 1990, NIDA research monograph.

[22]  S. Sadava Research approaches in illicit drug use: a critical review. , 1975, Genetic psychology monographs.