Strategies May Mediate Heritable Aspects of Memory Performance: A Twin Study

ObjectiveThis study examined use of strategies by twins during cognitive tasks to determine the effects of strategy-use on estimates of heritability. BackgroundPerformance on many cognitive tasks has been found to be more similar for monozygotic (MZ) than dizygotic (DZ) twins. The cognitive mechanisms mediating these similarities are largely unknown. MethodsThink-aloud protocol analysis was used during 3 cognitive tasks typically considered to have high heritability and susceptibility to strategy-use. In addition, a battery of traditional paper tests was administered to examine potential effects of cognitive abilities. ResultsPerformance on 3 cognitive tasks showed effects of strategies, and performance on 2 of the tasks showed a genetic influence. On 1 of these tasks differences in strategies explained a significant portion of the genetic influences. Measures of cognitive ability and metacognitive knowledge could not explain individual differences in strategy use. ConclusionsThis is the first demonstration that the estimated heritability of performance on cognitive tasks is mediated, at least in part, by the use of specific cognitive strategies. Future studies using similar techniques will permit a description of the development of cognitive mechanisms mediating heritable cognitive abilities, and a deeper understanding of the integration of genetic and environmental factors at the level of cognitive strategies and processes.

[1]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[2]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .

[3]  R. Plomin.  General cognitive ability. , 2003 .

[4]  R. W. Roring,et al.  Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: an account based on the expert performance framework , 2007 .

[5]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Intelligence: genetics, genes, and genomics. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  G. Geffen,et al.  Multivariate genetic analysis of cognitive abilities in an adolescent twin sample , 2004 .

[7]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[8]  Luby Stephan Prytulak,et al.  Natural language mediation , 1969 .

[9]  H B Richman,et al.  Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV. , 1995, Psychological review.

[10]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Spontaneous mentalizing during an interactive real world task: An fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[12]  Jeanette Taylor,et al.  The Florida State Twin Registry: research aims and design. , 2006, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[13]  N. Pedersen,et al.  Genetic influences on memory performance in adulthood: comparison of Minnesota and Swedish twin data. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[14]  K. McDermott,et al.  Genetic influences on free and cued recall in long-term memory tasks. , 2006, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[15]  K A Ericcson,et al.  Acquisition of a memory skill. , 1980, Science.

[16]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[17]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The Neural Bases of Strategy and Skill in Sentence–Picture Verification , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  E. Maguire,et al.  Routes to remembering: the brains behind superior memory , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  D. Detterman,et al.  Scholastic Assessment or g? , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  R. Downey,et al.  Intraclass Correlations: There's More There Than Meets the Eye , 1983 .

[21]  S. Martens,et al.  Rethinking neural efficiency: effects of controlling for strategy use. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Individual Differences in Memory , 2006, Neuron.

[23]  H. Harman,et al.  Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[24]  N L Segal,et al.  “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by , 2018 .

[25]  K Anders Ericsson.  Exceptional memorizers: made, not born. , 2003, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[26]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Hong Xian,et al.  Genetics of verbal working memory processes: a twin study of middle-aged men. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[28]  S. Hershberger,et al.  Genetic and environmental contributions to the acquisition of a motor skill , 1996, Nature.

[29]  W. C. Shipley.  Shipley Institute of Living Scale , 1983 .

[30]  Y. Ono,et al.  Genetic Structure of Spatial and Verbal Working Memory , 2001, Behavior genetics.

[31]  G. Bower.  Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning , 1970 .

[32]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Memory Span: Sources of Individual and Developmental Differences , 1981 .

[33]  G. Bower,et al.  Comparison of associative learning strategies , 1970 .

[34]  Earl Hunt,et al.  Strategy choice and strategy training in sentence—picture verification , 1980 .