The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods

Four Douglas-fir pulps, a refiner mechanical pulp (RMP), sulphonated RMP, delignified RMP and a kraft pulp were used to determine whether the lignin content and initial pore volume affected cellulase adsorption and substrate hydrolysis. When compared on the basis of lignin content, it was apparent from the cellulase treatment of the sulphonated RMP that the proportion of lignin did not affect enzyme adsorption when the fibres were sufficiently swollen. However, it was observed that the initial adsorption of cellulase does not always translate to fast and complete hydrolysis. Pore volume data revealed that although modification of lignin resulted in a dramatically increased fibre saturation point the median pore width was not increased accordingly. In contrast, the delignified RMP had a higher median pore width and was hydrolyzed more completely, suggesting that steric hindrance from the residual lignin may be the rate limiting characteristic in this situation. Hydrolysis of the kraft pulp indicated that the larger average particle size of this substrate might have been an inhibiting factor, since it was hydrolyzed more slowly than the delignified RMP despite having a higher median pore width and lower lignin content.

[1]  A. Converse,et al.  Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials based on surface area of cellulose accessible to enzyme and enzyme adsorption on lignin and cellulose , 1990 .

[2]  U. Westermark,et al.  Removal of Lignin-rich Surface Material from Unbleached Kraft Fibres , 1995 .

[3]  U. Westermark,et al.  Evidence for chemical bonds between lignin and cellulose in kraft pulps , 1996 .

[4]  A. M. Scallan,et al.  The influence of drying and beating on the swelling of fines , 1996 .

[5]  H. Grethlein,et al.  A comparative study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of acid‐pretreated white pine and mixed hardwood , 1984, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  A. Converse,et al.  Surface area of pretreated lignocellulosics as a function of the extent of enzymatic hydrolysis , 1989 .

[7]  J. Saddler,et al.  Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the morphology and fine structure of pretreated cellulosic residues , 1993 .

[8]  E. Cowling,et al.  Properties of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials as substrates for enzymatic conversion processes. , 1976, Biotechnology and bioengineering symposium.

[9]  J. Saddler,et al.  Comparison of steam pretreatment of eucalyptus, aspen, and spruce wood chips and their enzymatic hydrolysis , 1992 .

[10]  J. E. Stone,et al.  A structural model for the cell wall of water-swollen wood pulp fibres based on their accessibility to macromolecules , 1968 .

[11]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Modification of Douglas-fir mechanical and kraft pulps by enzyme treatment , 1996 .

[12]  H. Grethlein,et al.  The Effect of Pore Size Distribution on the Rate of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulosic Substrates , 1985, Bio/Technology.

[13]  J. Saddler,et al.  Evaluation of the enzymatic susceptibility of cellulosic substrates using specific hydrolysis rates and enzyme adsorption , 1994 .

[14]  L. Fan,et al.  The influence of major structural features of cellulose on rate of enzymatic hydrolysis , 1981 .

[15]  J. E. Stone,et al.  Effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood , 1965 .

[16]  L. Fan,et al.  Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis , 1980 .

[17]  M. Rivest,et al.  Sulphite treatment of aspen. Factors affecting the formation of carboxylate and sulphonate groups , 1985 .

[18]  T. Clark,et al.  The relationship between fiber‐porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam‐exploded Pinus radiata , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.