Tree growth response to drought and temperature in a mountain landscape in northern Arizona, USA

Aim  To understand how tree growth response to regional drought and temperature varies between tree species, elevations and forest types in a mountain landscape. Location  Twenty-one sites on an elevation gradient of 1500 m on the San Francisco Peaks, northern Arizona, USA. Methods  Tree-ring data for the years 1950–2000 for eight tree species (Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica (Merriam) Lemm., Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm., Pinus aristata Engelm., Pinus edulis Engelm., Pinus flexilis James, Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws., Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco and Quercus gambelii Nutt.) were used to compare sensitivity of radial growth to regional drought and temperature among co-occurring species at the same site, and between sites that differed in elevation and species composition. Results  For Picea engelmannii, Pinus flexilis, Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii, trees in drier, low-elevation stands generally had greater sensitivity of radial growth to regional drought than trees of the same species in wetter, high-elevation stands. Species low in their elevational range had greater drought sensitivity than co-occurring species high in their elevational range at the pinyon-juniper/ponderosa pine forest ecotone, ponderosa pine/mixed conifer forest ecotone and high-elevation invaded meadows, but not at the mixed conifer/subalpine forest ecotone. Sensitivity of radial growth to regional drought was greater at drier, low-elevation compared with wetter, high-elevation forests. Yearly growth was positively correlated with measures of regional water availability at all sites, except high-elevation invaded meadows where growth was weakly correlated with all climatic factors. Yearly growth in high-elevation forests up to 3300 m a.s.l. was more strongly correlated with water availability than temperature. Main conclusions  Severe regional drought reduced growth of all dominant tree species over a gradient of precipitation and temperature represented by a 1500-m change in elevation, but response to drought varied between species and stands. Growth was reduced the most in drier, low-elevation forests and in species growing low in their elevational range in ecotones, and the least for trees that had recently invaded high-elevation meadows. Constraints on tree growth from drought and high temperature are important for high-elevation subalpine forests located near the southern-most range of the dominant species.

[1]  W. Zech,et al.  Growth variations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe—a dendroecological study , 2003 .

[2]  J. Marshall,et al.  Correlated Population Differences in Dry Matter Accumulation, Allocation, and Water-Use Efficiency in Three Sympatric Conifer Species , 1996, Forest Science.

[3]  A. Thomson,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Hadley Centre (HadCM2) Climate Change Projections on Agricultural Productivity and Irrigation Water Supply in the Conterminous United States.I. Climate change scenarios and impacts on irrigation water supply simulated with the HUMUS model. , 2003 .

[4]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Analysis of Growth Trends and Variation in Conifers from Arizona and New Mexico: Youthful Trees, Competition, and Densitometric Chronologies , 1990 .

[5]  Margaret M. Moore,et al.  Southwestern Ponderosa Forest Structure: Changes Since Euro-American Settlement , 1994, Journal of Forestry.

[6]  D. Meko,et al.  The Tree-Ring Record of Severe Sustained Drought , 1995 .

[7]  M. Stokes,et al.  An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating , 1996 .

[8]  R. Duncan,et al.  Climate change and tree-ring relationships of Nothofagus menziesii tree-line forests , 2001 .

[9]  G. A. Pearson.  FACTORS CONTROLLING DISTRIBUTION OF FOREST TYPES , 1921 .

[10]  David L. Peterson,et al.  MOUNTAIN HEMLOCK GROWTH RESPONDS TO CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AT ANNUAL AND DECADAL TIME SCALES , 2001 .

[11]  Henri D. Grissino-Mayer,et al.  Evaluating Crossdating Accuracy: A Manual and Tutorial for the Computer Program COFECHA , 2001 .

[12]  Ricardo Villalba,et al.  Climatic influences on the growth of subalpine trees in the Colorado Front Range , 1994 .

[13]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Tree Encroachment on Meadows of the North Rim, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, U.S.A , 2004 .

[14]  P. Hanson,et al.  Drought disturbance from climate change: response of United States forests. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  R. Villalba,et al.  RECENT TRENDS IN TREE-RING RECORDS FROM HIGH ELEVATION SITES IN THE ANDES OF NORTHERN PATAGONIA , 1997 .

[16]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Dendroecology: A Tool for Evaluating Variations in Past and Present Forest Environments , 1989 .

[17]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Comparison of Historical and Contemporary Forest Structure and Composition on Permanent Plots in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests , 2004 .

[18]  E. Cook,et al.  A CHANGING TEMPERATURE RESPONSE WITH ELEVATION FOR LAGAROSTROBOS FRANKLINII IN TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA , 1997 .

[19]  J. Dracup,et al.  COMPARISON OF TREE SPECIES SENSITIVITY TO HIGH AND LOW EXTREME HYDROCLIMATIC EVENTS , 2001 .

[20]  G. Pearson.  Factors Controlling the Distribution of Forest Types, Part I , 1920 .

[21]  T. Kolb,et al.  Changes in whole-tree water relations during ontogeny of Pinus flexilis and Pinus ponderosa in a high-elevation meadow. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[22]  J. Rominger,et al.  A floristic inventory of the plant communities of the San Francisco Peaks Research Natural Area , 1983 .

[23]  J. E. Stone,et al.  Differences in leaf gas exchange and water relations among species and tree sizes in an Arizona pine-oak forest. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[24]  T. Kolb,et al.  Tree growth and regeneration response to climate and stream flow in a species-rich southwestern riparian forest , 2002 .

[25]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880-2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona , 2004 .

[26]  Eilif Dahl.  On the Relation between Summer Temperature and the Distribution of Alpine Vascular Plants in the Lowlands of Fennoscandia , 1951 .

[27]  Edward R. Cook,et al.  IDENTIFYING FUNCTIONAL GROUPS OF TREES IN WEST GULF COAST FORESTS (USA): A TREE-RING APPROACH , 2001 .

[28]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. , 1987 .

[29]  J. Bailey,et al.  Reconstruction of age structure and spatial arrangement of pinon-juniper woodlands and savannas of Anderson Mesa, northern Arizona , 2005 .

[30]  R. Monson,et al.  Temperature as a control over ecosystem CO2 fluxes in a high-elevation, subalpine forest , 2003, Oecologia.

[31]  J. Piñol,et al.  Ecological implications of xylem cavitation for several Pinaceae in the Pacific Northern USA , 2000 .

[32]  Ray R. Hicks,et al.  Influence of topographic aspect, precipitation and drought on radial growth of four major tree species in an Appalachian watershed , 2003 .

[33]  David L. Peterson,et al.  Growth response of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) to climate in the Olympic Mountains, Washington, USA , 1995 .

[34]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Mesoscale Disturbance and Ecological Response to Decadal Climatic Variability in the American Southwest , 1998 .

[35]  G. MacDonald,et al.  Age-dependent tree-ring growth responses of subarctic white spruce to climate , 1994 .

[36]  A. Sala,et al.  Xylem vulnerability to cavitation in Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa from contrasting habitats. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[37]  M. Applequist.  A simple pith locator for use with off-center increment cores , 1958 .

[38]  M. Abrams,et al.  Variation in radial growth responses to drought among species, site, and canopy strata , 1997, Trees.

[39]  M. Beniston.  Climate modeling at various spatial and temporal scales: where can dendrochronology help? , 2002 .

[40]  Malcolm K. Hughes,et al.  The climate of the US Southwest , 2002 .

[41]  Predicting effects of global warming on growth and mortality of upland oak species in the midwestern United States: a physiologically based dendroecological approach , 1992 .

[42]  David M. Meko,et al.  Pilot study of latewood‐width of conifers as an indicator of variability of summer rainfall in the North American monsoon region , 2001 .

[43]  W. Alley.  The Palmer Drought Severity Index: Limitations and Assumptions , 1984 .

[44]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona , 2002 .

[45]  Henri D. Grissino-Mayer,et al.  Standardizing the Reporting of Abrasive Papers Used to Surface Tree-Ring Samples , 2002 .

[46]  P. Gleick.  Water: the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the Water Resources of the U , 2000 .

[47]  J. Gregory,et al.  Summer Drought in Northern Midlatitudes in a Time-Dependent CO2 Climate Experiment , 1997 .

[48]  Harold C. Fritts,et al.  Tree Rings and Climate. , 1978 .

[49]  L. Graumlich.  Response of tree growth to climatic variation in the mixed conifer and deciduous forests of the upper Great Lakes region , 1993 .