Abstract By retrofitting conventional diesel railcars of type VT 642 and equipping them with a hybrid drive, EcoTrain project aims at developing hybrid technologies for railway vehicles in order to improve the efficiency of rail traffic on non-electrified lines. This especially bears high potentials for rural areas. The present study applies Life Cycle Assessment to three alternatives of trains’ power-sources for non-electrified lines (diesel, hybrid and hybrid with recharging stations) and compares the results under the same scope and boundary conditions. The study focuses on the three types of drives and the marginal requirements for each alternative (the carriage is similar). The contribution of each component for the environmental impact during a time-span of 15 years is analyzed on a mid-point and end-point perspective. The final results are discussed with regard to the critical aspects towards an informed life cycle engineering-based decision.
[1]
Jinglan Hong,et al.
Integrating life cycle costs and environmental impacts of composite rail car-bodies for a Korean train
,
2009
.
[2]
Henning Schwarz,et al.
Ecology profile of the german high-speed rail passenger transport system, ICE
,
2003
.
[3]
Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.
Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99
,
2003
.
[4]
Kyoon-Tai Kim,et al.
Development of a life cycle cost estimate system for structures of light rail transit infrastructure
,
2010
.
[5]
Francesco Del Pero,et al.
Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train
,
2015
.
[6]
Uwe Götze,et al.
Concept of Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Costing – Application to the Case of Designing a Hybrid Train☆
,
2017
.