Economic Evaluation of a Hybrid Desalination System Combining Forward and Reverse Osmosis

This study seeks to evaluate the performance and economic feasibility of the forward osmosis (FO)–reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid process; to propose a guideline by which this hybrid process might be more price-competitive in the field. A solution-diffusion model modified with film theory was applied to analyze the effects of concentration polarization, water, and salt transport coefficient on flux, recovery, seawater concentration, and treated wastewater of the FO process of an FO-RO hybrid system. A simple cost model was applied to analyze the effects of flux; recovery of the FO process; energy; and membrane cost on the FO-RO hybrid process. The simulation results showed that the water transport coefficient and internal concentration polarization resistance are very important factors that affect performance in the FO process; however; the effect of the salt transport coefficient does not seem to be large. It was also found that the flux and recovery of the FO process, the FO membrane, and the electricity cost are very important factors that influence the water cost of an FO-RO hybrid system. This hybrid system can be price-competitive with RO systems when its recovery rate is very high, the flux and the membrane cost of the FO are similar to those of the RO, and the electricity cost is expensive. The most important thing in commercializing the FO process is enhancing performance (e.g.; flux and the recovery of FO membranes).

[1]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[2]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[3]  C. D. Lundin,et al.  A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water , 2010 .

[4]  Mohammad Nurul Alam Hawlader,et al.  Design and economics of RO seawater desalination , 1996 .

[5]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Membrane rejection of nitrogen compounds. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. A. Darwish,et al.  Technical and Economical Comparison Between Large Capacity Multi Stage Flash and Reverse Osmosis Desalting Plants , 1989 .

[8]  Hern Kim,et al.  Low internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes with hydrophilic crosslinked PVA nanofibers as porous support layer , 2014 .

[9]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Opportunities to reach economic sustainability in forward osmosis–reverse osmosis hybrids for seawater desalination , 2015 .

[10]  Takeshi Matsuura,et al.  Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination — a review , 2001 .

[11]  Kiran A. Kekre,et al.  Recent developments and future challenges of forward osmosis for desalination: a review , 2012 .

[12]  Yosef Dreizin,et al.  Ashkelon seawater desalination project : off-taker's self costs, supplied water costs, total costs and benefits , 2006 .

[13]  Pio A. Aguirre,et al.  Global optimal design of reverse osmosis networks for seawater desalination: modeling and algorithm , 2005 .

[14]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[15]  O. A. Bamaga,et al.  Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: Preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations , 2011 .

[16]  Jincai Su,et al.  Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and me , 2011 .

[17]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[18]  Kristian Keiding,et al.  Lowering desalination costs by alternative desalination and water reuse scenarios , 2015 .

[19]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2011 .

[20]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[21]  Jeffrey R. McCutcheon,et al.  Electrospun nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis , 2011 .

[22]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of RO desalination plants , 2008 .

[23]  D. Yang,et al.  Theoretical investigation of hybrid desalination system combining reverse osmosis and forward osmosis , 2010 .

[24]  Yang-Dong Hu,et al.  Optimum design of reverse osmosis system under different feed concentration and product specification , 2007 .

[25]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook , 1998 .

[26]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .