How Educational Innovators Apply Diffusion and Scale-Up Concepts

The challenge of how to diffuse and scale up effective educational interventions has received increasing attention from researchers in recent years, though achievement of this objective has confounded policy makers, practitioners, and the scholarly community at least since the 1970s. This chapter presents three case studies of efforts at US community college STEM centers to apply diffusion and scale-up concepts to their educational innovations to advance student learning. Ours is an analysis of knowledge use. These community college innovators participated in a series of meetings and activities over 3 years to familiarize themselves with concepts and strategies about diffusion and scale-up and were encouraged to apply these concepts in practice. Case study results show that teams of innovators did try to use these concepts, some more than others, and worked to resolve the combined use of concepts to best suit their own objectives. Innovators found some concepts to be overlapping or redundant, some too complex to apply, and some in contradiction. We conclude that teams acted in creative ways to implement diffusion and scale-up concepts. Recommendations for future efforts to spread educational interventions are made.

[1]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[2]  W. N. Dunn,et al.  Knowledge in society: anatomy of an emergent field , 1988 .

[3]  M. Fullan The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[4]  Chris Dede,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Scaling Up , 2005 .

[5]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change , 1975 .

[6]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Historical Roots of Dissemination and Implementation Science , 2012 .

[7]  J. Dearing Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development , 2009, Research on social work practice.

[8]  C. Coburn,et al.  Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change , 2003 .

[9]  C. Dede,et al.  Scaling Up Success : Lessons Learned from Technology-Based Educational Improvement , 2005 .

[10]  H JanetR. Knowledge Disseminat ion and Use in Science and Mathemat ics Education: A Literature Review 1 , 2005 .

[11]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[12]  M. A. Scheirer,et al.  An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[13]  Stanley O. Ikenberry,et al.  Beyond Academic Departments: The Story of Institutes and Centers , 1973 .

[14]  G Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[16]  Jody Clarke,et al.  Design for Scalability: A Case Study of the River City Curriculum , 2009 .

[17]  James W Dearing,et al.  Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. , 2008, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[18]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  David B Buller,et al.  A convergent diffusion and social marketing approach for disseminating proven approaches to physical activity promotion. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  James W Dearing,et al.  Designing for diffusion: how can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations? , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  Robert Birnbaum How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership , 1988 .

[22]  D. Ball,et al.  Relations Between Policy and Practice: A Commentary , 1990 .

[23]  R. Havelock Planning for innovation through dissemi-nation and utilization of knowledge , 1969 .