Organization Design for Dynamic Fit: A Review and Projection

The concept of fit is central to organization design. In the organizational literature, fit historically has been portrayed as a static concept. Both organizations and their environments, however, are continually changing, so a valid concept of fit needs to reflect organizational dynamics. In this article, I analyze various theoretical perspectives and studies that relate to organizational fit, differentiating those that employ an equilibrating or a fluxing approach. Four substantive themes emerge from this analysis: design orientation, design tension, designer/manager roles, and measurement and validation. Implications of each of these themes for dynamic fit are derived, and promising future research directions are discussed.

[1]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Designing Work Within and Between Organizations , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[2]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[3]  Børge Obel,et al.  Design rules for dynamic organization design: the contribution of computational modeling , 2013 .

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[6]  F. Barrett Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[7]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change , 2000 .

[9]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization , 1996 .

[10]  YangYun,et al.  Aligning collaborative business processes , 2009 .

[11]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[12]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic organizational diagnosis and design : developing theory for application , 1995 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[14]  Børge Obel,et al.  Erratum: Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change , 2007 .

[16]  P. Narayan Pant,et al.  Deviation from Fit: An Advantage When Environments Change , 1998 .

[17]  R. Stacey The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[18]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[19]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizations in industry : strategy, structure, and selection , 1995 .

[20]  Ahmed Shafiqul Huque Organization design and effectiveness: a study of anti-crime organizations in Hong Kong , 1995 .

[21]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  50th ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .

[23]  S. Karim Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[24]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism , 1972 .

[27]  Jørgen Lauridsen,et al.  New Developments in Contingency Fit Theory , 2006 .

[28]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[29]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[30]  Børge Obel,et al.  Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Chengfei Liu,et al.  Steering Dynamic Collaborations Between Business Processes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[32]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[33]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[34]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Organization Design: The Evolving State-of-the-Art , 2006 .

[35]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[36]  Yun Yang,et al.  Aligning Collaborative Business Processes—An Organization-Oriented Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[37]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Conceptualizing Dynamic Organizational Fit in Multicontingency Contexts , 2008 .

[38]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[39]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[40]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[41]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[42]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence , 1994 .

[43]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[44]  E. L. Houghton,et al.  Aerodynamics for Engineering Students , 1970 .

[45]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[46]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[47]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[48]  B. McKelvey Quasi-natural Organization Science , 2016 .

[49]  L. Donaldson STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORY , 1987 .

[50]  B. McKelvey Organizational Systematics-Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification , 1982 .

[51]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance , 2012 .

[52]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Structural Properties of Sustainable, Continuous Change , 2013 .

[54]  M L Tushman,et al.  Building ambidextrous organizations. Forming your own "skunk works". , 1999, Health Forum journal.

[55]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Dynamic Knowledge Patterns to Inform Design: A Field Study of Knowledge Stocks and Flows in an Extreme Organization , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[58]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[60]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame , 1984 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[62]  Daniela Fischer,et al.  Organizational Design A Step By Step Approach , 2016 .

[63]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Toward Harmonizing Command and Control with Organization and Management Theory , 2009 .

[64]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[65]  Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Adaptive Fit Versus Robust Transformation: How Organizations Respond to Environmental Change , 2005 .

[66]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[67]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[68]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  Designing Organizations for Dynamic Fit: System Stability, Maneuverability, and Opportunity Loss , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[69]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[70]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.