Today's sediment budget of the Rhine River channel, focusing on the Upper Rhine Graben and Rhenish Massif

Abstract The river bed of the Rhine River is subject to severe erosion and sedimentation. Such high geomorphological process rates are unwanted for economical, ecological, and safety reasons. The objectives of this study were (1) to quantify the geomorphological development of the Rhine River between 1985 and 2006; (2) to investigate the bed erosion process; and (3) to distinguish between tectonic, hydrological, and human controls. We used a unique data set with thousands of bedload and suspended-load measurements and quantified the fluxes of gravel, sand, silt, and clay through the northern Upper Rhine Graben and the Rhenish Massif. Furthermore, we calculated bed level changes and evaluated the sediment budget of the channel. Sediment transport rates were found to change in the downstream direction: silt and clay loads increase because of tributary supply; sand loads increase because of erosion of sand from the bed; and gravel loads decrease because of reduced sediment mobility caused by the base-level control exerted by the uplifting Rhenish Massif. This base-level control shows tectonic setting, in addition to hydrology and human interventions, to represent a major control on morphodynamics in the Rhine. The Rhine bed appears to be in a state of disequilibrium, with an average net bed degradation of 3 mm/a. Sand being eroded from the bed is primarily washed away in suspension, indicating a rapid supply of sand to the Rhine delta. The degradation is the result of an increased sediment transport capacity caused by nineteenth and twentieth century's river training works. In order to reduce degradation, huge amounts of sediment are fed into the river by river managers. Bed degradation and artificial sediment feeding represent the major sources of sand and gravel to the study area; only small amounts of sediment are supplied naturally from upstream or by tributaries. Sediment sinks include dredging, abrasion, and the sediment output to the downstream area. Large uncertainties exist about the amounts of sediment deposited on floodplains and in groyne fields. Compared to the natural situation during the middle Holocene, the present-day gravel and sand loads seem to be lower, whereas the silt and clay loads seem to be higher. This is probably caused by the present-day absence of meander migration, the deforestation, and the reduced sediment trapping efficiency of the floodplains. Even under natural conditions no equilibrium bed level existed.

[1]  N. Asselman Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves , 2000 .

[2]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Simulating low‐probability peak discharges for the Rhine basin using resampled climate modeling data , 2010 .

[3]  R. Frings Sedimentary Characteristics of the Gravel–Sand Transition in the River Rhine , 2011 .

[4]  R. Ferguson River Loads Underestimated by Rating Curves , 1986 .

[5]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Overbank sand deposition in relation to transport volumes during large‐magnitude floods in the Dutch sand‐bed Rhine river system , 1998 .

[6]  J. Stets,et al.  Pleistocene to Recent tectonics in the Rhenish Massif (Germany) , 2002, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[7]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Equilibrium or indeterminate? Where sediment budgets fail: Sediment mass balance and adjustment of channel form, Green River downstream from Flaming Gorge Dam, Utah and Colorado , 2005 .

[8]  Maarten G. Kleinhans,et al.  Human‐induced changes in bed shear stress and bed grain size in the River Waal (The Netherlands) during the past 900 years , 2009 .

[9]  G. Erkens Sediment dynamics in the Rhine catchment. Quantification of fluvial response to climate change and human impact , 2003 .

[10]  J. Stets,et al.  Das Rheintal zwischen Bingen und Bonn , 1996 .

[11]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Regimes and Water Resources Management in the Rhine Basin , 2001 .

[12]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Upper Rhine Graben: Role of preexisting structures during rift evolution , 2002 .

[13]  Holger Schüttrumpf,et al.  Verification of porosity predictors for fluvial sand‐gravel deposits , 2011 .

[14]  P. Kuenen Experimental abrasion; 3, Fluviatile action on sand , 1959 .

[15]  R. Dikau,et al.  Holocene floodplain sediment storage and hillslope erosion within the Rhine catchment , 2007 .

[16]  Maarten G. Kleinhans,et al.  Discriminating between pore‐filling load and bed‐structure load: a new porosity‐based method, exemplified for the river Rhine , 2008 .

[17]  M. D. Vries A morphological time-scale for rivers , 1975 .

[18]  H. Middelkoop,et al.  Holocene sediment budgets of the Rhine Delta (The Netherlands): a record of changing sediment delivery , 2006 .

[19]  E. Gölz Bed Degradation – Nature, Causes, Countermeasures , 1994 .

[20]  Robert M. Summers,et al.  The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An Empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay , 1992 .

[21]  Peter van der Veer,et al.  Sand exchange between groyne‐field beaches and the navigation channel of the Dutch Rhine: the impact of navigation versus river flow , 2004 .