Coordination: Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth " Bomber

decision-making by reducing agency (measurement) costs. This This paper explores the economic processes through which incombination of effects may generalize to other settings in which formation technology can facilitate coordination within and beinformation technology is used to promote coordination, espetween firms, The paper presents and analyzes a case study of cially in "virtual" or "disaggregated corporations. the B-2 "Stealth" bomber, an aircraft that was designed by four (Information Technology; Coordination; Governance) firms almost entirely by computer. The key information systems used in the project were (1) a common-access database to manage part designs and (2) an advanced system to perform structural analysis. These systems played a crucial role in enabling the four firms to coordinate their design and development activities precisely enough to meet the demanding engineering The industrial future, we are told, belongs not to large requirements imposed by the aircraft's unique mission. The pabureaucratic organizations, but to networks of small afper analyses the case study using transaction cost, agency, and information processing theories. filiated companies that exchange with each other using The analysis leads to several conclusions about the mechaadvanced information systems. These networks have nisms through which the variables emphasized in these theories been dubbed "virtual corporations." (Davidow and operated to improve coordination. First, the information sysMalone 1992, Byrne 1993) Malone et al. (1987), for extems aided coordination directly by making information proample, have argued that information systems reduce the cessing less costly. Second, this enhanced information processcosts of coordination between buyers and suppliers, leading made the governance of the project more efficient. In ing to a greater reliance on markets to organize economic particular, by establishing a "technical grammar" for commuactivity at the expense of hierarchies. In support of this nication, the systems helped to create social conventions around claim, Brynjolffson et al. (1994) found that increases in which firms could coordinate their activities, thus limiting the information technology (IT) investments by U.S. firms need for a hierarchical authority to promote coordination. This have been associated with a decline in firm size. technical grammar also reduced governance costs by reducing asset-specificity, thereby reducing risks associated with conScholars have also argued that advanced IT is leading tractual holdup. These interactions between communication and to more decentralization of decision-making within firms. governance effects have not been elucidated in the ITIcoordiZenger and Hesterly (1997) hold that firms are using IT nation literature. They are important in part because they help to "disaggregate" their activities to facilitate decentraliexplain why the vertically disintegrated organization of the prozation. Johnston and Lawrence (1988), Lawler (1988), ject proved viable. Finally, the systems facilitated decentralized and others argue that by reducing unit costs of processing 1047-7039/99/1002/0162/$05.00 Copyright

[1]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high powered incentives and molecular units , 1997 .

[2]  C. Ciborra Teams, Markets and Systems: Business Innovation and Information Technology , 1993 .

[3]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[5]  J. Bakos,et al.  From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer‐supplier relationships , 1993 .

[6]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[7]  Clay Sprawls,et al.  The virtual corporation , 1993 .

[8]  H. B. Malmgren Information, Expectations and the Theory of the Firm , 1961 .

[9]  Y. Barzel,et al.  Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[10]  R. Langlois Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time , 1992 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[12]  J. Barney,et al.  Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[13]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[14]  Nicholas Argyres EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF FIRM CAPABILITIES IN VERTICAL INTEGRATION DECISIONS , 1996 .

[15]  O. Williamson Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[16]  Kirk Monteverde Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry , 1995 .

[17]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Computer-based Automation and the Governance of Vertical Transactions , 1993 .

[18]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[19]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[20]  Diego Gambetta Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1992 .

[21]  D. North,et al.  Structure and Change in Economic History , 1983 .

[22]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[23]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Substitutes for hierarchy , 1988 .

[24]  H. Demsetz The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[25]  R. Brandis The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[26]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[27]  B. Klein,et al.  Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process , 1978, The Journal of Law and Economics.