5.14 – Woody Biomass

An in-depth summary is presented on the state of technology of woody resources available for bioenergy. Resources discussed include several types of short-rotation woody crops, also called short-rotation forestry, and a variety of forestland-derived resources. Species most widely planted and researched for short-rotation applications include willow, poplar, eucalyptus, and pine. Production strategies include both coppice and single-stem management approaches and a wide range of planting densities. Data are presented on observed yields and feedstock supply analysis. Forestland-derived resources include logging residues and thinnings as well as industrial wood residues and urban wood wastes. Topics discussed for all resource types include harvesting/collection techniques, economics, and sustainability.

[1]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels , 2009 .

[2]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  Historical Patterns of Forest Fertilization in the Southeastern United States from 1969 to 2004 , 2007 .

[3]  Lynn L. Wright,et al.  Worldwide commercial development of bioenergy with a focus on energy crop-based projects , 2006 .

[4]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Willow biomass producer's handbook. , 2002 .

[5]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Cutting cycle and spacing effects on biomass production by a willow clone in New York , 1997 .

[6]  Richard F. Daniels,et al.  Aboveground biomass and nitrogen in four short-rotation woody crop species growing with different water and nutrient availabilities , 2008 .

[7]  P. Heilman,et al.  Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. IV. Performance in short-rotation coppice. , 1990 .

[8]  David R. Coyle,et al.  Effects of repeated cottonwood leaf beetle defoliation on Populus growth and economic value over an 8-year harvest rotation , 2008 .

[9]  L. Samuelson,et al.  Growth and physiology of loblolly pine in response to long-term resource management: defining growth potential in the southern United States , 2008 .

[10]  W. Post,et al.  Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States , 2008 .

[11]  Timothy P. McDonald,et al.  Effect of Slash on Forwarder Soil Compaction , 2013 .

[12]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[13]  A. Berthelot,et al.  Nutrient uptake and immobilization in a short-rotation coppice stand of hybrid poplars in north-west France , 2000 .

[14]  Timothy A. Martin,et al.  Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands , 2000 .

[15]  T. Williams,et al.  Biomass accumulation in rapidly growing loblolly pine and sweetgum , 2006 .

[16]  T. J. Mullin,et al.  Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south , 2003 .

[17]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[18]  Roger D. Fight,et al.  Evaluation of silvicultural treatments and biomass use for reducing fire hazard in western states , 2006 .

[19]  A. Leinonen,et al.  Harvesting technology of forest residues for fuel in the USA and Finland. , 2004 .

[20]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Short rotation coppice tree species selection for woody biomass production in New Zealand , 2001 .

[21]  M. Stolarski,et al.  Productivity of seven clones of willow coppice in annual and quadrennial cutting cycles. , 2008 .

[22]  T. Volk,et al.  Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State , 2001 .

[23]  J. Isebrands,et al.  The Development of improved willow clones for eastern North America , 2001 .

[24]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to a coppice, growth-modelling approach , 1996 .

[25]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Direct and indirect land‐use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production – an overview , 2010 .

[26]  A. Lindroth,et al.  Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability , 1999 .

[27]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[28]  D. Dickmann.  Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. , 2006 .

[29]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[30]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  The Development of Pine Plantation Silviculture in the Southern United States , 2007 .

[31]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Biomass production physiology and soil carbon dynamics in short-rotation-grown Populus deltoides and P. deltoides × P. nigra hybrids , 2009 .

[32]  Blas Mola-Yudego,et al.  Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden , 2008 .

[33]  L. Christersson.  Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden , 2010 .

[34]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[35]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. , 2002 .

[36]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops , 2004 .

[37]  D. Grebner,et al.  Evaluation of Loblolly Pine Management Regimes in Mississippi for Biomass Supplies: A Simulation Approach , 2010 .

[38]  E. Hansen,et al.  Hybrid poplar spacing/productivity relations in short rotation intensive culture plantations , 1993 .

[39]  S. Grado,et al.  Input-output analysis of energy requirements for short rotation, intensive culture, woody biomass , 1992 .

[40]  Timothy A. Martin,et al.  Genotype × environment interactions in selected loblolly and slash pine plantations in the Southeastern United States , 2007 .

[41]  R. Bailey,et al.  Loblolly Pine—Pushing the Limits of Growth , 2001 .

[42]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: Land productivity potentials. , 2010 .

[43]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The Brazil Eucalyptus Potential Productivity Project: Influence of water, nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production , 2010 .

[44]  J. R. Hess,et al.  A Preliminary Assessment of the State of Harvest and Collection Technology for Forest Residues , 2008 .

[45]  Michael A. Blazier,et al.  New pine planting strategies for the Western Gulf States , 2007 .

[46]  David Paré,et al.  Soil Nutrient Dynamics after Harvesting and Slash Treatments in Boreal Aspen Stands , 2006 .

[47]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Delimbing hybrid poplar prior to processing with a flail/chipper , 2000 .

[48]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantations , 2006 .

[49]  R. Hüttl,et al.  Growth dynamics and biomass accumulation of 8-year-old hybrid poplar clones in a short-rotation plantation on a clayey-sandy mining substrate with respect to plant nutrition and water budget , 2004, European Journal of Forest Research.

[50]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  What is Ahead for Intensive Pine Plantation Silviculture in the South , 2005 .

[51]  Ian Shield,et al.  Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[52]  C. Harrington,et al.  Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings: 7-year results for two clones at three spacings , 1996 .

[53]  Bruce E. Borders,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics for 13-year-old loblolly pine stands receiving complete competition control and annual N fertilizer , 2006 .

[54]  C. Müller,et al.  Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: a spatially explicit mathematical programming approach. , 2008 .

[55]  W. Dale Greene,et al.  Evaluation of integrated harvesting systems in pine stands of the southern United States , 2010 .

[56]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  A harvest and transport cost model for Eucalyptus spp. fast-growing short rotation plantations. , 2009 .

[57]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  Tree Nutrition and Forest Fertilization of Pine Plantations in the Southern United States , 2007 .

[58]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry , 2011 .

[59]  Ioannis Dimitriou,et al.  Willows for energy and phytoremediation in Sweden , 2005 .

[60]  S. Grado,et al.  Cost parameters affecting multiple rotation SRIC biomass systems , 1990 .

[61]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[62]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Effect of complete competition control and annual fertilization on stem growth and canopy relations for a chronosequence of loblolly pine plantations in the lower coastal plain of Georgia , 2004 .

[63]  M. Coleman,et al.  Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation , 2005 .

[64]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity , 2004 .

[65]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[66]  M. Proe,et al.  Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry , 2002 .

[67]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years) , 2008 .

[68]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio‐energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world , 2006 .

[69]  D. Andrew Scott,et al.  Dual-cropping loblolly pine for biomass energy and conventional wood products. , 2008 .

[70]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Productivity of Southern Pine Plantations: Where Are We and How Did We Get Here? , 2003, Journal of Forestry.

[71]  Jerrold E. Winandy,et al.  Energy Product Options for Eucalyptus Species Grown as Short Rotation Woody Crops , 2008, International journal of molecular sciences.

[72]  Maria K. Janowiak,et al.  Promoting Ecological Sustainability in Woody Biomass Harvesting , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[73]  Robert D. Perlack,et al.  Technical and economic status of wood energy feedstock production , 1995 .

[74]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Short-rotation coppiced vs non-coppiced poplar: a comparative study at two different field sites , 1996 .

[75]  M. Hinchee,et al.  Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications , 2009, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[76]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Extracting whole short rotation trees with a skidder and a front-end loader , 2001 .

[77]  P. Heilman,et al.  Above- and below-ground biomass and fine roots of 4-year-old hybrids of Populustrichocarpa × Populusdeltoides and parental species in short-rotation culture , 1994 .

[78]  Gerald A. Tuskan,et al.  Poplar breeding and testing strategies in the north-central U.S.: demonstration of potential yield and consideration of future research needs , 2001 .

[79]  Anders Roos,et al.  Willow growers in Sweden , 2000 .

[80]  INVENTORIES OF WOODY RESIDUES AND SOLID WOOD WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES, 2002 , 2004 .

[81]  Traian I. Teodorescu,et al.  Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada) , 2005 .

[82]  P. Heilman,et al.  Genetic variation and productivity of Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a 4-year plantation , 1985 .

[83]  Roger D. Fight,et al.  Broad-Scale Assessment of Fuel Treatment Opportunities , 2006 .

[84]  Matthew H. Langholtz,et al.  The economic feasibility of reclaiming phosphate mined lands with short-rotation woody crops in Florida , 2007 .

[85]  James A. Burger,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Drainage, Bedding, and Fertilization on Growth of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the Coastal Plain of Virginia , 2005 .

[86]  M. Gribskov,et al.  The Genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) , 2006, Science.

[87]  A. Antón,et al.  LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario , 2009 .

[88]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[89]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  State of the World's Forests 2001 , 2001 .

[90]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation , 2006 .