The impact and implications of the growth in residential user-to-user traffic

It has been reported worldwide that peer-to-peer traffic is taking up a significant portion of backbone networks. In particular, it is prominent in Japan because of the high penetration rate of fiber-based broadband access. In this paper, we first report aggregated traffic measurements collected over 21 months from seven ISPs covering 42% of the Japanese backbone traffic. The backbone is dominated by symmetric residential traffic which increased 37%in 2005. We further investigate residential per-customer trafficc in one of the ISPs by comparing DSL and fiber users, heavy-hitters and normal users, and geographic traffic matrices. The results reveal that a small segment of users dictate the overall behavior; 4% of heavy-hitters account for 75% of the inbound volume, and the fiber users account for 86%of the inbound volume. About 63%of the total residential volume is user-to-user traffic. The dominant applications exhibit poor locality and communicate with a wide range and number of peers. The distribution of heavy-hitters is heavy-tailed without a clear boundary between heavy-hitters and normal users, which suggests that users start playing with peer-to-peer applications, become heavy-hitters, and eventually shift from DSL to fiber. We provide conclusive empirical evidence from a large and diverse set of commercial backbone data that the emergence of new attractive applications has drastically affected traffic usage and capacity engineering requirements.

[1]  Mikel Izal,et al.  Dissecting BitTorrent: Five Months in a Torrent's Lifetime , 2004, PAM.

[2]  Mary K. Vernon,et al.  Characterizing the query behavior in peer-to-peer file sharing systems , 2004, IMC '04.

[3]  Chase Cotton,et al.  Packet-level traffic measurements from the Sprint IP backbone , 2003, IEEE Netw..

[4]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload , 2003, SOSP '03.

[5]  Andrew Odlyzko,et al.  Internet traffic growth: sources and implications , 2003, SPIE ITCom.

[6]  Jia Wang,et al.  Analyzing peer-to-peer traffic across large networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[7]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  Is P2P dying or just hiding? [P2P traffic measurement] , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[8]  Stefan Saroiu,et al.  A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems , 2001 .

[9]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? , 2005, IMC '05.

[10]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Deriving traffic demands for operational IP networks: methodology and experience , 2001, TNET.

[11]  Daniel Stutzbach,et al.  Characterizing unstructured overlay topologies in modern P2P file-sharing systems , 2005 .

[12]  George C. Polyzos,et al.  Traffic characteristics of the T1 NSFNET backbone , 1993, IEEE INFOCOM '93 The Conference on Computer Communications, Proceedings.

[13]  Hiroshi Esaki,et al.  The impact of residential broadband traffic on Japanese ISP backbones , 2005, CCRV.

[14]  Lawrence Lessig The Future of Ideas , 2001 .

[15]  Tobias Oetiker,et al.  MRTG: The Multi Router Traffic Grapher , 1998, LISA.

[16]  Matthew Roughan,et al.  Experience in measuring internet backbone traffic variability: Models metrics, measurements and meaning , 2003 .

[17]  Xiaoning Ding,et al.  Measurements, analysis, and modeling of BitTorrent-like systems , 2005, IMC '05.

[18]  Patrick Brown,et al.  Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Traffic on ADSL , 2005, PAM.

[19]  V. Paxson,et al.  Growth trends in wide-area TCP connections , 1994, IEEE Network.