Characteristics of a global classification system for perinatal deaths: a Delphi consensus study

BackgroundDespite the global burden of perinatal deaths, there is currently no single, globally-acceptable classification system for perinatal deaths. Instead, multiple, disparate systems are in use world-wide. This inconsistency hinders accurate estimates of causes of death and impedes effective prevention strategies. The World Health Organisation (WHO) is developing a globally-acceptable classification approach for perinatal deaths. To inform this work, we sought to establish a consensus on the important characteristics of such a system.MethodsA group of international experts in the classification of perinatal deaths were identified and invited to join an expert panel to develop a list of important characteristics of a quality global classification system for perinatal death. A Delphi consensus methodology was used to reach agreement. Three rounds of consultation were undertaken using a purpose built on-line survey. Round one sought suggested characteristics for subsequent scoring and selection in rounds two and three.ResultsThe panel of experts agreed on a total of 17 important characteristics for a globally-acceptable perinatal death classification system. Of these, 10 relate to the structural design of the system and 7 relate to the functional aspects and use of the system.ConclusionThis study serves as formative work towards the development of a globally-acceptable approach for the classification of the causes of perinatal deaths. The list of functional and structural characteristics identified should be taken into consideration when designing and developing such a system.

[1]  Un Desa.  Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[2]  Brämer Gr.  International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision. , 1988, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[3]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Making Stillbirths Count, Making Numbers Talk-Issues in Data collection for Stillbirths , 2010 .

[4]  David Osrin,et al.  Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030 , 2016, The Lancet.

[5]  D. Jenkins,et al.  Applying Delphi methodology in family therapy research , 1994 .

[6]  J. Lawn,et al.  Seeking order amidst chaos: a systematic review of classification systems for causes of stillbirth and neonatal death, 2009–2014 , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[7]  B. Stray-Pedersen,et al.  Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Wolf D. Rauch,et al.  The decision Delphi , 1979 .

[9]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  R. Malcomson,et al.  Keeling’s Fetal and Neonatal Pathology , 2015, Springer International Publishing.

[11]  H. McKenna.  The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  A. Thomson,et al.  THE CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF STILLBIRTHS AND FIRST WEEK DEATHS , 1954, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.

[13]  A. Thomson,et al.  THE CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF STILLBIRTHS AND FIRST WEEK DEATHS , 1953 .

[14]  K. New.  Every Newborn: An Action plan to end preventable deaths , 2013 .

[15]  M. Woodruff,et al.  A RUNNING COMMENTARY BY PERIPATETIC CORRESPONDENTS. , 1963, Lancet.

[16]  Colin Mathers,et al.  Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival , 2014, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Wigglesworth,et al.  MONITORING PERINATAL MORTALITY A Pathophysiological Approach , 1980, The Lancet.

[18]  J. C. Kuijpers,et al.  Fundamental classification of perinatal death. Validation of a new classification system of perinatal death. , 2002, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  S. Gordijn,et al.  The Tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter‐rater agreement , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  B. Källén,et al.  NICE, a new cause of death classification for stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Neonatal and Intrauterine Death Classification according to Etiology. , 1998, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  J. Neilson,et al.  Giving a voice to millions: developing the WHO application of ICD‐10 to deaths during the perinatal period: ICD‐PM , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  Keelin O'Donoghue,et al.  Ending preventable stillbirths 3 Stillbirth: Why invest? , 2018 .

[23]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Classification of stillbirth: A global approach , 2010 .

[24]  Roman Goldenberg,et al.  Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries , 2016, The Lancet.

[25]  M. Holm,et al.  The Stockholm classification of stillbirth , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[26]  G. Braemer.  International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision. , 1988, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[27]  N. Sebire,et al.  Systematic review of placental pathology reported in association with stillbirth. , 2014, Placenta.

[28]  S. Cousens,et al.  Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? , 2011, The Lancet.

[29]  R. Pattinson,et al.  Causes of Death and Associated Conditions (Codac) – A Utilitarian Approach to the Classification of Perinatal Deaths , 2009 .