Economic Burden of Sanfilippo Syndrome in the United States

Abstract Introduction: Sanfilippo syndrome is a rare disease and fatal genetic disorder in the United States with no FDA-approved treatment, and no comprehensive assessment of economic disease burden is available. Objective To develop a model to estimate the economic burden associated with Sanfilippo syndrome in the United States (US) using valued intangibles (disability-adjusted life years lost) and indirect burden (lost caregiver productivity) from 2023 onward. Design and Setting: A multistage comorbidity model was generated using publicly available literature on Sanfilippo syndrome disability, and 14 disability weights from the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study. Attributable increase in caregiver mental health burden and caregiver productivity loss were also estimated using data from the CDC National Comorbidity Survey, retrospective studies on caregiver burden in Sanfilippo syndrome, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Monetary valuations were adjusted to USD 2023 and given a 3% discount rate from 2023 onward. Main Outcomes and Measures: Year-over-year incidence and prevalence of Sanfilippo syndrome was calculated for each age group in each year, and year-over-year disability-adjust life years (DALYs) lost due to patient disability was calculated by comparing to health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE), considering years of life lost (YLLs) due to premature mortality and years lived with disability (YLDs). Intangibles were valued in USD 2023, adjusted for inflation and discounted to provide economic burden of disease. Results From 2023–2043, overall economic burden in the US attributable to Sanfilippo syndrome was estimated to be $1.55 billion USD with current standard of care. The burden to individual families exceeded $5.86 million present value from time of birth per child born with Sanfilippo syndrome. These figures are also a conservative estimate, since they do not consider direct cost associated with the disease, as extensive primary data on the direct healthcare cost of Sanfilippo syndrome does not currently exist in the literature. Conclusions and Relevance: Sanfilippo syndrome is a rare lysosomal storage disease, however the severe burden associated with the disease for individual families demonstrates a profound cumulative impact. Our model represents the first disease burden estimate associated with Sanfilippo syndrome. This underscores the substantial morbidity and mortality burden of Sanfilippo syndrome.

[1]  R. Giugliani,et al.  Sanfilippo syndrome: consensus guidelines for clinical care , 2022, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[2]  J. Mellerio The challenges of clinical trials in rare diseases , 2022, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  J. Hinkel,et al.  The economics of moonshots: Value in rare disease drug development , 2022, Clinical and translational science.

[4]  H. Rehm Time to make rare disease diagnosis accessible to all , 2022, Nature Medicine.

[5]  R. Rubin The Cost of Rare Diseases. , 2021, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[6]  Shanshan Wu,et al.  Global epidemiology of mucopolysaccharidosis type III (Sanfilippo syndrome): an updated systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM.

[7]  L. Lynd,et al.  Toward the diagnosis of rare childhood genetic diseases: what do parents value most? , 2021, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[8]  A. Nahvijou,et al.  Cost per DALY averted in low, middle- and high-income countries: evidence from the global burden of disease study to estimate the cost-effectiveness thresholds , 2021, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.

[9]  J. Baruteau,et al.  Novel therapies for mucopolysaccharidosis type III , 2020, Journal of inherited metabolic disease.

[10]  Emily P. Terlizzi,et al.  Symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Among Adults: United States, 2019. , 2020, NCHS data brief.

[11]  C. Murray,et al.  Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study , 2020, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Iacovino,et al.  A Cure for Sanfilippo Syndrome? A Summary of Current Therapeutic Approaches and their Promise. , 2020, Medical research archives.

[13]  Florence T. Bourgeois,et al.  Noncompletion and nonpublication of trials studying rare diseases: A cross-sectional analysis , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[14]  K. Romero,et al.  Regulatory strategies for rare diseases under current global regulatory statutes: a discussion with stakeholders , 2019, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[15]  D. Brody,et al.  Prevalence of Depression Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 2013-2016. , 2018, NCHS data brief.

[16]  F. Wijburg,et al.  Failure to shorten the diagnostic delay in two ultra-orphan diseases (mucopolysaccharidosis types I and III): potential causes and implications , 2018, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[17]  C. Lourenço,et al.  Epilepsy in mucopolysaccharidosis disorders. , 2017, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[18]  S. Jones,et al.  Practical management of behavioral problems in mucopolysaccharidoses disorders. , 2017, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[19]  A. Shaywitz,et al.  Recommendations on clinical trial design for treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type III , 2017, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[20]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 2016, JAMA.

[21]  H. Boshuizen,et al.  Accounting for multimorbidity can affect the estimation of the Burden of Disease: a comparison of approaches , 2016, Archives of Public Health.

[22]  C. Tudur Smith,et al.  A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov , 2014, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[23]  C. Heldermon,et al.  Mucopolysaccharidosis III (Sanfilippo Syndrome)- disease presentation and experimental therapies. , 2014, Pediatric endocrinology reviews : PER.

[24]  R. Giugliani,et al.  The laboratory diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis III (Sanfilippo syndrome): A changing landscape. , 2014, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[25]  E. Cantone,et al.  Management of otolaryngological manifestations in mucopolysaccharidoses: our experience , 2013, Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale.

[26]  P. Hogan,et al.  Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U , 2013 .

[27]  B. Burton,et al.  Mucopolysaccharidosis type III (Sanfilippo syndrome) and misdiagnosis of idiopathic developmental delay, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder , 2013, Acta paediatrica.

[28]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[29]  Rolf H H Groenwold,et al.  Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[30]  M. Grootenhuis,et al.  Cognitive development in patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis type III (Sanfilippo syndrome) , 2011, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[31]  D. Scherman,et al.  Neuroinflammatory and oxidative stress phenomena in MPS IIIA mouse model: the positive effect of long-term aspirin treatment. , 2011, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[32]  D. Zafeiriou,et al.  Incidence and natural history of mucopolysaccharidosis type III in France and comparison with United Kingdom and Greece , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[33]  R. Wevers,et al.  Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA: Clinical spectrum and genotype‐phenotype correlations , 2010, Annals of neurology.

[34]  R. Wevers,et al.  Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIB may predominantly present with an attenuated clinical phenotype , 2010, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[35]  A. Pshezhetsky,et al.  Clinical and genetic spectrum of Sanfilippo type C (MPS IIIC) disease in The Netherlands. , 2008, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[36]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): design and field procedures , 2004, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[37]  M. Delatycki,et al.  Sleep disturbance in mucopolysaccharidosis type III (Sanfilippo syndrome): a survey of managing clinicians , 2002, Clinical genetics.

[38]  P. Meikle,et al.  Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. , 1999, JAMA.

[39]  J. Zhang,et al.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.

[40]  J. Deeks When can odds ratios mislead? , 1998 .

[41]  M. Bax,et al.  Behaviour in mucopolysaccharide disorders. , 1995, Archives of disease in childhood.

[42]  J. E. Wraith,et al.  Management of mucopolysaccharidosis type III. , 1993 .

[43]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  L. Haverman,et al.  Psychosocial Functioning in Parents of MPS III Patients. , 2019, JIMD reports.

[45]  Y. Puckett,et al.  Epidemiology of mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in the United States: challenges and opportunities , 2017 .

[46]  Archives of Stem Cell and Therapy , 2022 .