Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability

The progress of replication forks is often threatened in vivo, both by DNA damage and by proteins bound to the template. Blocked forks must somehow be restarted, and the original blockage cleared, in order to complete genome duplication, implying that blocked fork processing may be critical for genome stability. One possible pathway that might allow processing and restart of blocked forks, replication fork reversal, involves the unwinding of blocked forks to form four-stranded structures resembling Holliday junctions. This concept has gained increasing popularity recently based on the ability of such processing to explain many genetic observations, the detection of unwound fork structures in vivo and the identification of enzymes that have the capacity to catalyse fork regression in vitro. Here, we discuss the contexts in which fork regression might occur, the factors that may promote such a reaction and the possible roles of replication fork unwinding in normal DNA metabolism.

[1]  L. Johnston,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle mutant cdc9 is defective in DNA ligase , 1978, Nature.

[2]  S. West,et al.  Initiation of genetic recombination: homologous pairing between duplex DNA molecules promoted by recA protein. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  T4-endonuclease V-sensitive sites in DNA from ultraviolet-irradiated human cells. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[5]  P. Silver,et al.  Elimination of replication block protein Fob1 extends the life span of yeast mother cells. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[6]  A. Aguilera The connection between transcription and genomic instability , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[7]  B. Michel,et al.  Cells defective for replication restart undergo replication fork reversal , 2004, EMBO reports.

[8]  F. Fabre,et al.  Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[9]  C. Mathew,et al.  A human ortholog of archaeal DNA repair protein Hef is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group M , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[10]  P. Hanawalt THE U.V. SENSITIVITY OF BACTERIA: ITS RELATION TO THE DNA REPLICATION CYCLE , 1966, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[11]  K. Nordström,et al.  Replication arrests during a single round of replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome in the absence of DnaC activity , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  S. West,et al.  In Vitro Reconstitution of the Late Steps of Genetic Recombination in E. coli , 1997, Cell.

[13]  Ian D. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination , 2003, Nature.

[14]  S. Ehrlich,et al.  Lethality of rep recB and rep recC double mutants of Escherichia coli , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  Hotchkiss Rd Models of genetic recombination. , 1974 .

[16]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  DNA Binding by the Substrate Specificity (Wedge) Domain of RecG Helicase Suggests a Role in Processivity* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Leonard Wu,et al.  Role of the BLM helicase in replication fork management. , 2007, DNA repair.

[18]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[19]  B. Michel,et al.  RuvAB is essential for replication forks reversal in certain replication mutants , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[20]  R. Stein,et al.  Transcription-induced barriers to supercoil diffusion in the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  P. Bianco,et al.  RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  P. Noirot,et al.  Anticipating chromosomal replication fork arrest: SSB targets repair DNA helicases to active forks , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[23]  A. Carr,et al.  Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements and Elevated Recombination at an Inducible Site-Specific Replication Fork Barrier , 2005, Cell.

[24]  O. Espéli,et al.  Untangling intracellular DNA topology , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  D. Wigley,et al.  Structure and mechanism of helicases and nucleic acid translocases. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Crystal Structure of DNA Recombination Protein RuvA and a Model for Its Binding to the Holliday Junction , 1996, Science.

[27]  Roger Woodgate,et al.  Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis , 2000, Nature.

[28]  R. Kanaar,et al.  Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. , 2001, Mutation research.

[29]  V. Zakian,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  A. Carr,et al.  RAD6–RAD18–RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light , 2009, Nature.

[31]  P. Sung,et al.  Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[32]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  RecBCD Enzyme and the Repair of Double-Stranded DNA Breaks , 2008, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[33]  P. Hsieh,et al.  The kinetics of spontaneous DNA branch migration. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  I. Hickson RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  A. Carr,et al.  Replication fork arrest, recombination and the maintenance of ribosomal DNA stability. , 2008, DNA repair.

[36]  S. Casaregola,et al.  Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ultraviolet-irradiated E. coli: Inhibition is independent of recA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[37]  J. T. Kadonaga,et al.  HARP Is an ATP-Driven Annealing Helicase , 2008, Science.

[38]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  A model for dsDNA translocation revealed by a structural motif common to RecG and Mfd proteins , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[39]  R. Setlow,et al.  Thymine Dimers and Inhibition of DNA Synthesis by Ultraviolet Irradiation of Cells , 1963, Science.

[40]  R. Hotchkiss Models of genetic recombination. , 1974, Annual review of microbiology.

[41]  T. Shibata,et al.  Homologous pairing in genetic recombination: recA protein makes joint molecules of gapped circular DNA and closed circular DNA , 1980, Cell.

[42]  S. Gasser,et al.  Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. , 2005, Genes & development.

[43]  L. Prakash,et al.  Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[44]  I. Hickson,et al.  DNA helicases required for homologous recombination and repair of damaged replication forks. , 2006, Annual review of genetics.

[45]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Independent Positioning and Action of Escherichia coli Replisomes in Live Cells , 2008, Cell.

[46]  S. West,et al.  Mechanism of E. coli RecA protein directed strand exchanges in post-replication repair of DNA , 1981, Nature.

[47]  B. Michel,et al.  Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks. , 2007, DNA repair.

[48]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Functional Uncoupling of Twin Polymerases , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  C. D. Hardy,et al.  Topological challenges to DNA replication: Conformations at the fork , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  T. Nakagawa,et al.  Regulation of DNA Replication Machinery by Mrc1 in Fission Yeast , 2006, Genetics.

[51]  R. Heller,et al.  Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand , 2006, Nature.

[52]  B. Michel,et al.  Impairment of lagging strand synthesis triggers the formation of a RuvABC substrate at replication forks , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[53]  I. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's Syndrome Helicase Can Promote the Regression of a Model Replication Fork* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Replication fork blockage by transcription factor-DNA complexes in Escherichia coli , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[55]  Robert G. Martin,et al.  The remarkable instability of replication loops provides a general method for the isolation of origins of DNA replication , 1981, Cell.

[56]  Radhakrishnan Kanagaraj,et al.  Human RECQ5β helicase promotes strand exchange on synthetic DNA structures resembling a stalled replication fork , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  J. Lupski,et al.  RecQ promotes toxic recombination in cells lacking recombination intermediate-removal proteins. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[58]  Wensheng Wang,et al.  Functional Relation among RecQ Family Helicases RecQL1, RecQL5, and BLM in Cell Growth and Sister Chromatid Exchange Formation , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[59]  David T. Long,et al.  Fork regression is an active helicase‐driven pathway in bacteriophage T4 , 2009, EMBO reports.

[60]  D. Wigley,et al.  Structural Analysis of DNA Replication Fork Reversal by RecG , 2001, Cell.

[61]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Targeting Holliday Junctions by the RecG Branch Migration Protein of Escherichia coli * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[62]  P. McGlynn,et al.  Replication forks blocked by protein-DNA complexes have limited stability in vitro. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  David T. Long,et al.  Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4 , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  J. Diffley,et al.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint , 2001, Nature.

[65]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Holliday Junctions Accumulate in Replication Mutants via a RecA Homolog-Independent Mechanism , 1997, Cell.

[66]  B. Michel,et al.  Replication restart in gyrB Escherichia coli mutants , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[67]  S. A. Chow,et al.  RecA protein-promoted homologous pairing and strand exchange between intact and partially single-stranded duplex DNA. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  J. Groden,et al.  The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[69]  I. Hickson,et al.  RecQ helicases: guardian angels of the DNA replication fork , 2008, Chromosoma.

[70]  B. Michel,et al.  Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[71]  K. Nakao,et al.  Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  J. Sogo,et al.  Architecture of the Replication Fork Stalled at the 3′ End of Yeast Ribosomal Genes , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[73]  H. Shinagawa,et al.  ATP‐dependent resolution of R‐loops at the ColE1 replication origin by Escherichia coli RecG protein, a Holliday junction‐specific helicase , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[74]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  A. Stasiak,et al.  Supercoiling, knotting and replication fork reversal in partially replicated plasmids. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[76]  J. Courcelle,et al.  RecQ and RecJ process blocked replication forks prior to the resumption of replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli , 1999, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[77]  C. Newlon,et al.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks , 2001, Nature.

[78]  Masato T. Kanemaki,et al.  Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. , 2005, Genes & development.

[79]  T. Lindahl The Croonian Lecture, 1996: endogenous damage to DNA. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[80]  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer,et al.  Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[81]  B. Michel,et al.  DNA double‐strand breaks caused by replication arrest , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[82]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[83]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  Bacteriophage T4 UvsW protein is a helicase involved in recombination, repair and the regulation of DNA replication origins , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[84]  M. Whitby,et al.  The FANCM Ortholog Fml1 Promotes Recombination at Stalled Replication Forks and Limits Crossing Over during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2008, Molecular cell.

[85]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[86]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Replication fork stalling and cell cycle arrest in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 2007, Genes & development.

[87]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  The Translocating RecBCD Enzyme Stimulates Recombination by Directing RecA Protein onto ssDNA in a χ-Regulated Manner , 1997, Cell.

[88]  B. Michel,et al.  ruvA and ruvB mutants specifically impaired for replication fork reversal , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[89]  H. Hiasa,et al.  Role of the Core DNA Polymerase III Subunits at the Replication Fork , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[90]  L. Prakash,et al.  Yeast DNA repair protein RAD5 that promotes instability of simple repetitive sequences is a DNA-dependent ATPase. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[91]  G. Luo,et al.  Recql5 and Blm RecQ DNA Helicases Have Nonredundant Roles in Suppressing Crossovers , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[92]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  Formation and processing of stalled replication forks--utility of two-dimensional agarose gels. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[93]  S. Pack,et al.  Nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination systems commit differentially to the repair of DNA-protein crosslinks. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[94]  Michael G. Sehorn,et al.  Rad51 Recombinase and Recombination Mediators* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[95]  S. West,et al.  The directionality of RuvAB‐mediated branch migration: in vitro studies with three‐armed junctions , 1996, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[96]  M. Gottesman,et al.  Genetics and function of DNA ligase in Escherichia coli. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[97]  L. Prakash,et al.  Yeast Rad5 Protein Required for Postreplication Repair Has a DNA Helicase Activity Specific for Replication Fork Regression , 2007, Molecular cell.

[98]  C. D. Hardy,et al.  Topological domain structure of the Escherichia coli chromosome. , 2004, Genes & development.

[99]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing , 2008, Nature.

[100]  P. Howard-Flanders,et al.  Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[101]  J. Courcelle,et al.  Nascent DNA processing by RecJ favors lesion repair over translesion synthesis at arrested replication forks in Escherichia coli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[102]  V. Bohr,et al.  Junction of RecQ Helicase Biochemistry and Human Disease* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[103]  B. Michel,et al.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[104]  M. R. Webb,et al.  The Phage T4 Protein UvsW Drives Holliday Junction Branch Migration* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[105]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  RNA-DNA hybrid formation at a bacteriophage T4 replication origin. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[106]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Replisome Fate upon Encountering a Leading Strand Block and Clearance from DNA by Recombination Proteins* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[107]  S. Jackson,et al.  DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. , 2008, Genes & development.

[108]  William Hyde Wollaston,et al.  I. The Croonian Lecture , 1810, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[109]  P. Doan,et al.  Two types of recombination hotspots in bacteriophage T4: one requires DNA damage and a replication origin and the other does not. , 2001, Genetics.

[110]  H. Shinagawa,et al.  Crystal structure of the RuvA-RuvB complex: a structural basis for the Holliday junction migrating motor machinery. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[111]  Yulong Shen,et al.  Hjm/Hel308A DNA Helicase from Sulfolobus tokodaii Promotes Replication Fork Regression and Interacts with Hjc Endonuclease In Vitro , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[112]  M. Cox,et al.  RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[113]  S. Ehrlich,et al.  RuvAB Acts at Arrested Replication Forks , 1998, Cell.

[114]  J. Griffith,et al.  Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[115]  T. Nilsen,et al.  Unusual base-pairing of newly synthesized DNA in HeLa cells. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[116]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Crystal structure of E.coli RuvA with bound DNA Holliday junction at 6 Å resolution , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[117]  T. Nohmi Environmental stress and lesion-bypass DNA polymerases. , 2006, Annual review of microbiology.

[118]  R. Heller,et al.  Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[119]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  The DNA replication protein PriA and the recombination protein RecG bind D-loops. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[120]  Stephen L. Slocum,et al.  Characterization of the ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli RecG protein reveals that the preferred cofactor is negatively supercoiled DNA. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[121]  V. Costanzo,et al.  ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[122]  C. Wilde,et al.  Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[123]  J. Drake,et al.  UvsX Recombinase and Dda Helicase Rescue Stalled Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication Forks in Vitro* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[124]  M. F. White,et al.  The junction-resolving enzymes , 2001, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology.

[125]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: Simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[126]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Positive Torsional Strain Causes the Formation of a Four-way Junction at Replication Forks* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[127]  Ian Grainge,et al.  Tracking of controlled Escherichia coli replication fork stalling and restart at repressor‐bound DNA in vivo , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[128]  Andrzej Stasiak,et al.  The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[129]  J. Louarn,et al.  Analysis and possible role of hyperrecombination in the termination region of the Escherichia coli chromosome , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[130]  T. Hill,et al.  Escherichia coli Tus protein acts to arrest the progression of DNA replication forks in vitro. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[131]  J. Courcelle,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair or Polymerase V-Mediated Lesion Bypass Can Act To Restore UV-Arrested Replication Forks in Escherichia coli , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[132]  J. Courcelle,et al.  Inactivation of the DnaB Helicase Leads to the Collapse and Degradation of the Replication Fork: a Comparison to UV-Induced Arrest , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[133]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  The RecG branch migration protein of Escherichia coli dissociates R-loops. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[134]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Modulation of RNA Polymerase by (p)ppGpp Reveals a RecG-Dependent Mechanism for Replication Fork Progression , 2000, Cell.

[135]  E. Egelman,et al.  Novel pro- and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom's syndrome helicase. , 2007, Genes & development.

[136]  Rod Balhorn,et al.  Processive translocation and DNA unwinding by individual RecBCD enzyme molecules , 2001, Nature.

[137]  J. Schvartzman,et al.  Replication Fork Reversal Occurs Spontaneously after Digestion but Is Constrained in Supercoiled Domains* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[138]  B. Michel,et al.  RuvABC‐dependent double‐strand breaks in dnaBts mutants require RecA , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[139]  T. Horiuchi,et al.  Recombinational rescue of the stalled DNA replication fork: a model based on analysis of an Escherichia coli strain with a chromosome region difficult to replicate , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[140]  B. J. Brewer,et al.  Analysis of replication intermediates by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[141]  B. Michel,et al.  ruvA Mutants That Resolve Holliday Junctions but Do Not Reverse Replication Forks , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[142]  O. Aparicio,et al.  Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[143]  F. Wanka,et al.  The origin of nascent single-stranded DNA extracted from mammalian cells. , 1977, Nucleic acids research.

[144]  C. Mathew Fanconi anaemia genes and susceptibility to cancer , 2006, Oncogene.

[145]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[146]  M. Cox,et al.  Situational Repair of Replication Forks , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[147]  S. Gangloff,et al.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". , 2000, Genes & development.

[148]  B. Strauss,et al.  A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[149]  B. Strauss,et al.  Production of DNA bifilarly substituted with bromodeoxyuridine in the first round of synthesis: branch migration during isolation of cellular DNA. , 1978, Nucleic acids research.

[150]  S. Benkovic,et al.  The T4 Phage UvsW Protein Contains Both DNA Unwinding and Strand Annealing Activities* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[151]  R. Kriwacki,et al.  Crystallographic and NMR Analyses of UvsW and UvsW.1 from Bacteriophage T4* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[152]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[153]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Avoiding and resolving conflicts between DNA replication and transcription. , 2007, DNA repair.

[154]  L. Wiesmüller,et al.  P53 inhibits strand exchange and replication fork regression promoted by human Rad51. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[155]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Action of RuvAB at Replication Fork Structures* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[156]  S. Gasser,et al.  Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[157]  V. Bohr,et al.  Human diseases deficient in RecQ helicases. , 2003, Biochimie.

[158]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Replication fork regression in vitro by the Werner syndrome protein (WRN): Holliday junction formation, the effect of leading arm structure and a potential role for WRN exonuclease activity , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[159]  A. Constantinou,et al.  Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[160]  B. Gómez-González,et al.  Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[161]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  DNA binding and helicase domains of the Escherichia coli recombination protein RecG. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[162]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Sgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends , 2008, Cell.

[163]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Uncoupling of Leading- and Lagging-Strand DNA Replication During Lesion Bypass in Vivo , 2003, Science.

[164]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex , 2003, Nature.

[165]  Y. Fujiwara,et al.  Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. , 1976, Mutation research.

[166]  S. West,et al.  Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. , 1997, Annual review of genetics.

[167]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[168]  B. Friedlander Gimme a Break! , 2010 .

[169]  Cameron Neylon,et al.  Replication Termination in Escherichia coli: Structure and Antihelicase Activity of the Tus-Ter Complex , 2005, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[170]  J. Courcelle,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Replication Fork Regression and Processing in Escherichia coli , 2003, Science.

[171]  M. Radman,et al.  Specialized DNA Polymerases, Cellular Survival, and the Genesis of Mutations , 2002, Science.

[172]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Characterisation of the catalytically active form of RecG helicase. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[173]  S. West,et al.  Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast , 2008, Nature.

[174]  J. Vos,et al.  Differential replication of a single, UV-induced lesion in the leading or lagging strand by a human cell extract: fork uncoupling or gap formation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[175]  S. Elledge,et al.  Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. , 2003, Genes & development.

[176]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[177]  M. Lopes,et al.  Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.

[178]  M. Cox,et al.  The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.

[179]  Myron F. Goodman,et al.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks , 2000, Nature.