Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Stein | I. Alesh | Muhammad Janjua | F. Kayali | Ronald E. Olson | E. Skaf | A. Beemath
[1] Mario J. Garcia. Noninvasive coronary angiography: hype or new paradigm? , 2005, JAMA.
[2] J. Mehta,et al. Evaluation of Venous and Arterial Conduit Patency by 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2004, Circulation.
[3] Stephen Schroeder,et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] Peter Hunold,et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] P. D. de Feyter,et al. Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: an emerging clinical modality. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] S. Schroeder,et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology , 2004 .
[7] J. Willmann,et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. , 2004, Radiology.
[8] L. Bonomo,et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography , 2004, European Radiology.
[9] Peter M T Pattynama,et al. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. , 2003, Radiology.
[10] Byoung Wook Choi,et al. The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography. , 2003, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[11] S. Silber,et al. Nichtinvasive Angiographie koronarer Bypassgefäße mit dem Cardio-CT in einer kardiologischen Praxis , 2003, Herz.
[12] David Moher,et al. The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].
[13] P. Costello,et al. Coronary artery bypass graft flow: qualitative evaluation with cine single-detector row CT and comparison with findings at angiography. , 2002, Radiology.
[14] J Simon,et al. New Technical Developments in Multislice CT, Part 2: Sub-Millimeter 16-Slice Scanning and Increased Gantry Rotation Speed for Cardiac Imaging , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[15] J Simon,et al. New technical developments in multislice CT , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[16] E. Wenkel,et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.
[17] M. Reiser,et al. Non-invasive coronary bypass graft imaging after multivessel revascularisation. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.
[18] P. Bossuyt,et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.
[19] Andrew C. Stanley,et al. The Use of Delayed Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Preliminary Report , 1999, The American surgeon.
[20] Y. Tsutsumi,et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[21] M. Reiser,et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.
[22] D. Cook,et al. Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[23] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.
[24] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .
[25] P. Costello,et al. Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[26] W. Judmaier,et al. Die Wertigkeit von CT und MRT bei der Erfassung von aortokoronaren Venenbrücken im Vergleich zur Koronarangiographie , 1991 .
[27] V. Mühlberger,et al. Predictive value of computed tomographic determination of the patency rate of aortocoronary venous bypasses in relation to angiographic results. , 1990, European heart journal.
[28] R. Slaughter,et al. Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with fast dynamic scanning. , 1990, Australasian radiology.
[29] R. Wilson,et al. Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] D. Berman,et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. , 1987, Circulation.
[31] F. Burkart,et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts. Influence of preoperative risk factors on the late postoperative course. , 1985, Chest.
[32] I. Isherwood,et al. Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1984, British heart journal.
[33] S. Hayase,et al. [Assessment of aorto-coronary bypass graft patency and graft flow by contrast enhanced computed tomography]. , 1984, [Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai.
[34] O. Gutierrez,et al. Early evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: CT or selective angiography. , 1984, European journal of radiology.
[35] W. Daniel,et al. Value and Limitations of Computed Tomography in Assessing Aortocoronary Bypass Graft Patency , 1983, Circulation.
[36] R. Califf,et al. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[37] L. Heuser,et al. [Validity of computed tomography for the demonstration of patent or occluded aortocoronary vein grafts. A multicenter study]. , 1982, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[38] K Lackner,et al. Computed tomography of the heart: ECG-gated and continuous scans. , 1981, Radiology.
[39] L. E. Watts,et al. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft status by computed tomography. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.
[40] R. Moncada,et al. Patency of saphenous aortocoronary-bypass grafts demonstrated by computed tomography. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.
[41] E. S. Weiss,et al. Computed tomography of the heart. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[42] N. Monteforte,et al. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms]. , 2004, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.
[43] P. Klimeczek,et al. [Evaluation of patency of coronary artery bypass grafts and stents using multislice spiral computed tomography in comparison with angiography]. , 2002, Przeglad lekarski.
[44] R. Schmitt,et al. [Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses]. , 2002, Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik.
[45] A. Schuchert,et al. [The value of spiral computed tomography in the imaging of aortocoronary bypass vessels]. , 1994, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[46] D. L. Sackett,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.