Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting.

[1]  Mario J. Garcia Noninvasive coronary angiography: hype or new paradigm? , 2005, JAMA.

[2]  J. Mehta,et al.  Evaluation of Venous and Arterial Conduit Patency by 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. D. de Feyter,et al.  Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: an emerging clinical modality. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Schroeder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology , 2004 .

[7]  J. Willmann,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography , 2004, European Radiology.

[9]  Peter M T Pattynama,et al.  Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. , 2003, Radiology.

[10]  Byoung Wook Choi,et al.  The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography. , 2003, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  S. Silber,et al.  Nichtinvasive Angiographie koronarer Bypassgefäße mit dem Cardio-CT in einer kardiologischen Praxis , 2003, Herz.

[12]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[13]  P. Costello,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft flow: qualitative evaluation with cine single-detector row CT and comparison with findings at angiography. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  J Simon,et al.  New Technical Developments in Multislice CT, Part 2: Sub-Millimeter 16-Slice Scanning and Increased Gantry Rotation Speed for Cardiac Imaging , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[15]  J Simon,et al.  New technical developments in multislice CT , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[16]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  M. Reiser,et al.  Non-invasive coronary bypass graft imaging after multivessel revascularisation. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.

[19]  Andrew C. Stanley,et al.  The Use of Delayed Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Preliminary Report , 1999, The American surgeon.

[20]  Y. Tsutsumi,et al.  Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[21]  M. Reiser,et al.  Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[25]  P. Costello,et al.  Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  W. Judmaier,et al.  Die Wertigkeit von CT und MRT bei der Erfassung von aortokoronaren Venenbrücken im Vergleich zur Koronarangiographie , 1991 .

[27]  V. Mühlberger,et al.  Predictive value of computed tomographic determination of the patency rate of aortocoronary venous bypasses in relation to angiographic results. , 1990, European heart journal.

[28]  R. Slaughter,et al.  Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with fast dynamic scanning. , 1990, Australasian radiology.

[29]  R. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  D. Berman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. , 1987, Circulation.

[31]  F. Burkart,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafts. Influence of preoperative risk factors on the late postoperative course. , 1985, Chest.

[32]  I. Isherwood,et al.  Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1984, British heart journal.

[33]  S. Hayase,et al.  [Assessment of aorto-coronary bypass graft patency and graft flow by contrast enhanced computed tomography]. , 1984, [Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai.

[34]  O. Gutierrez,et al.  Early evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: CT or selective angiography. , 1984, European journal of radiology.

[35]  W. Daniel,et al.  Value and Limitations of Computed Tomography in Assessing Aortocoronary Bypass Graft Patency , 1983, Circulation.

[36]  R. Califf,et al.  Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  L. Heuser,et al.  [Validity of computed tomography for the demonstration of patent or occluded aortocoronary vein grafts. A multicenter study]. , 1982, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[38]  K Lackner,et al.  Computed tomography of the heart: ECG-gated and continuous scans. , 1981, Radiology.

[39]  L. E. Watts,et al.  Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft status by computed tomography. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[40]  R. Moncada,et al.  Patency of saphenous aortocoronary-bypass grafts demonstrated by computed tomography. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  E. S. Weiss,et al.  Computed tomography of the heart. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  N. Monteforte,et al.  [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms]. , 2004, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[43]  P. Klimeczek,et al.  [Evaluation of patency of coronary artery bypass grafts and stents using multislice spiral computed tomography in comparison with angiography]. , 2002, Przeglad lekarski.

[44]  R. Schmitt,et al.  [Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses]. , 2002, Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik.

[45]  A. Schuchert,et al.  [The value of spiral computed tomography in the imaging of aortocoronary bypass vessels]. , 1994, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[46]  D. L. Sackett,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.