A randomized trial of risk‐adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men—Results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial

There is no generally accepted screening strategy for prostate cancer (PCa). From February 2014 to December 2019 a randomized trial (PROBASE) recruited 46 642 men at age 45 to determine the efficacy of risk‐adapted prostate‐specific antigen‐based (PSA) screening, starting at either 45 or 50 years. PSA tests are used to classify participants into a low (<1.5 ng/mL), intermediate (1.5‐2.99 ng/mL) or high (≥3 ng/mL) risk group. In cases of confirmed PSA values ≥3 ng/mL participants are recommended a prostate biopsy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Half of the participants (N = 23 341) were offered PSA screening immediately at age 45; the other half (N = 23 301) were offered digital rectal examination (DRE) with delayed PSA screening at age 50. Of 23 301 participants who accepted baseline PSA testing in the immediate screening arm, 89.2% fell into the low, 9.3% into intermediate, and 1.5% (N = 344) into the high risk group. Repeat PSA measurement confirmed high‐risk status for 186 men (0.8%), of whom 120 (64.5%) underwent a biopsy. A total of 48 PCas was detected (overall prevalence 0.2%), of which 15 had International Society of Uropathology (ISUP) grade 1, 29 had ISUP 2 and only 4 had ISUP ≥3 cancers. In the delayed screening arm, 23 194 participants were enrolled and 6537 underwent a DRE with 57 suspicious findings, two of which showed PCa (both ISUP 1; detection rate 0.03%). In conclusion, the prevalence of screen‐detected aggressive (ISUP ≥3) PCa in 45‐year‐old men is very low. DRE did not turn out effective for early detection of PCa.

[1]  P. Albers,et al.  A European Model for an Organised Risk-stratified Early Detection Programme for Prostate Cancer. , 2021, European urology oncology.

[2]  A. Finelli,et al.  The long-term outcomes of Gleason grade groups 2 and 3 prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: Results from a large population-based cohort. , 2020, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  V. Laudone,et al.  Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center. , 2020, The Journal of urology.

[5]  K. Macura,et al.  Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort. , 2020, European urology.

[6]  V. Laudone,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer - The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience. , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[7]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2019, European urology.

[8]  B. Hadaschik,et al.  Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization , 2018, The International journal of biological markers.

[9]  P. Stattin,et al.  Association Between Lead Time and Prostate Cancer Grade: Evidence of Grade Progression from Long-term Follow-up of Large Population-based Cohorts Not Subject to Prostate-specific Antigen Screening. , 2017, European urology.

[10]  C. Holmberg,et al.  [Cancer screening in Germany: availability and participation]. , 2018, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[11]  P. Albers,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[12]  David Gillatt,et al.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  B. Delahunt,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  German National Cohort Consortium,et al.  The German National Cohort: aims, study design and organization , 2014, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  G. Kristiansen,et al.  Prospective randomized evaluation of risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen screening in young men: the PROBASE trial. , 2013, European urology.

[16]  S. Cole,et al.  Prostate involvement during sexually transmitted infections as measured by prostate-specific antigen concentration , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  P. Scardino,et al.  Prediction of significant prostate cancer diagnosed 20 to 30 years later with a single measure of prostate‐specific antigen at or before age 50 , 2011, Cancer.

[18]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer in unselected young men: prospective cohort nested within a randomised controlled trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  C. Stegmaier,et al.  Report on trends of incidence (1970–2002) of and mortality (1952–2002) from cancer in Germany , 2006, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Dr. Andreas Böhle Relationship between initial prostate specific antigen level and subsequent prostate cancer detection in a longitudinal screening study , 2004 .

[22]  L. Weinehall,et al.  Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study Cohort- evaluation of risk factors and their interactions , 2003, Scandinavian journal of public health. Supplement.

[23]  G. Berglund,et al.  The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. , 1993, Journal of internal medicine.