A model metadata schema for environmental hazard models and its implementation in the PURE portal

Abstract Geohazards, e.g. floods and landslides, are increasingly resulting in loss of life and economic damage. Process models can help the understanding of the frequency and occurrence of these hazards, reducing their impact. However, models require significant resources to develop and, ideally, should be made widely available. Further, integrated modelling demands that process models are discoverable, available and, ultimately, linkable. Metadata standards are defined for data, but the equivalent for process models are not yet available as an international standard or even as accepted best practice. Requirements have been gathered for model metadata using a questionnaire and a metadata schema has been developed. The resulting schema split model code (software) and model instance (application) given that model codes are used multiple times. International data metadata standards, e.g. ISO19115, have been used for the core of the standard. The schema has been implemented via the PURE portal ( www.pureportal.org ) which makes models available and forms the basis of an international standard for model metadata.

[1]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management of Natural Hazards , 2016 .

[2]  Scott D. Peckham The CSDMS Standard Names: Cross-Domain Naming Conventions for Describing Process Models, Data Sets and Their Associated Variables , 2014 .

[3]  Quillon Harpham,et al.  The FluidEarth 2 implementation of OpenMI 2.0 , 2014 .

[4]  R. Moore,et al.  Integrated environmental modelling: achieving the vision , 2016, Special Publications.

[5]  J. B. Gregersen,et al.  OpenMI: Open modelling interface , 2007 .

[6]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Alison Black,et al.  Developing a quick guide on presenting data and uncertainty , 2017 .

[8]  Quillon Harpham,et al.  Towards standard metadata to support models and interfaces in a hydro-meteorological model chain , 2015 .

[9]  Roy Lowry,et al.  The NERC Vocabulary Server: Version 2.0 , 2012 .

[10]  Jeffery S. Horsburgh,et al.  Design of a metadata framework for environmental models with an example hydrologic application in HydroShare , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  C. Jackson,et al.  Numerical testing of conceptual models of groundwater flow: a case study using the Dumfries Basin aquifer , 2005, Scottish Journal of Geology.

[12]  Hydrologic Modeling Inventory: Cooperative Research Effort , 2006 .

[13]  Jeffery S. Horsburgh,et al.  HydroShare: Sharing Diverse Environmental Data Types and Models as Social Objects with Application to the Hydrology Domain , 2016 .

[14]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  An overview of the model integration process: From pre-integration assessment to testing , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[16]  Cecelia DeLuca,et al.  Earth system curator: metadata infrastructure for climate modeling , 2008, Earth Sci. Informatics.

[17]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology, Part I: Achieving Interoperability at the Schema Level , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[18]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology, Part II: Achieving Interoperability at the Record and Repository Levels , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[19]  David Etkin,et al.  Risk transference and related trends: driving forces towards more mega-disasters , 1999 .

[20]  Quillon Harpham,et al.  Introductory overview: The OpenMI 2.0 standard for integrating numerical models , 2019, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Andrew Hughes,et al.  Meta-model : ensuring the widespread access to metadata and data for environmental models : scoping report , 2013 .