The road towards accurate optical width measurements at the industrial level

Optical vision systems require both unidirectional and bidirectional measurements for the calibrations and the verification of the tool performance to enable accurate measurements traceable to the SI unit Metre. However, for bidirectional measurements up to now the national metrology institutes are unable to provide internationally recognized calibrations of suitable standards. Furthermore often users are not aware of the specific difficulties of these measurements. In this paper the current status and limitations of bidirectional optical measurements at the industrial level are summarised and compared to state-of-the-art optical linewidth measurements performed at PTB on measurement objects of semiconductor industry. It turns out, that for optical widths measurements at an uncertainty level below 1 μm edge localisation schemes are required, which are based on tool and sample dependent threshold values, which usually need to be determined by a rigorous simulation of the microscopic image. Furthermore the calibration samples and structures must have a sufficient quality, e. g. high edge angle and low edge roughness and the structure materials and their material parameters have to be known. The experience obtained within the accreditation process of industrial labs for width calibrations shows that, in order to be able to achieve a desired measurement uncertainties of about 100 nm, the imaging system needs to have a monochromatic Koehler illumination, numerical aperture larger than 0.5, a magnification greater than 50x and the ability to control the deviation of the focus position to better than 100 nm.

[1]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Optical metrology of micro- and nanostructures at PTB: status and future developments , 2008, International Symposium on Laser Metrology.

[2]  Jens Flugge,et al.  Recent activities at PTB nanometer comparator , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[3]  Wolfgang Osten,et al.  Optical Imaging and Metrology: Advanced Technologies , 2012 .

[4]  James E. Potzick,et al.  International comparison of photomask linewidth standards: United States (NIST) and United Kingdom (NPL) , 1996, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Harald Bosse,et al.  Calibration of CD mask standards for the 65-nm node: CoG and MoSi , 2007, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[6]  Harald Bosse,et al.  An electron optical metrology system for pattern placement measurements , 1998 .

[7]  Wolfgang Haessler-Grohne,et al.  Two-dimensional photomask standards calibration , 1992, Other Conferences.

[8]  M. Totzeck,et al.  Numerical simulation of high-NA quantitative polarization microscopy and corresponding near-fields , 2001 .

[9]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrological performance of optical coordinate measuring machines under industrial conditions , 2010 .

[10]  Harald Bosse,et al.  Quantitative Optical Microscopy at the Nanoscale: New Developments and Comparisons , 2012 .

[11]  Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung , 1873 .

[12]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[13]  Lin Zschiedrich,et al.  Benchmark of FEM, waveguide, and FDTD algorithms for rigorous mask simulation , 2005, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[14]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Comparison of different approaches for modelling microscope images on the basis of rigorous diffraction calculation , 2005, SPIE Optical Metrology.

[15]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Theoretical modelling and experimental verification of the influence of Cr edge profiles on microscopic-optical edge signals for COG masks , 2006, SPIE Photomask Technology.