Soft biohybrid morphing wings with feathers underactuated by wrist and finger motion

A soft biohybrid aerial robot with underactuated feathers shows how birds can steer by morphing their wings with wrists and fingers. Since the Wright Flyer, engineers have strived to develop flying machines with morphing wings that can control flight as deftly as birds. Birds morph their wing planform parameters simultaneously—including sweep, span, and area—in a way that has proven to be particularly challenging to embody robotically. Previous solutions have primarily centered around the classical aerospace paradigm of controlling every degree of freedom to ensure predictable performance, but underperform compared with birds. To understand how birds accomplish wing morphing, we measured the kinematics of wing flexion and extension in common pigeons, Columba livia. The skeletal and feather kinematics show that the 20 primary and 20 secondary feathers are coordinated via approximately linear transfer functions controlled by wrist and finger motion. To replicate this control principle in a robot, we developed a biohybrid morphing wing with real feathers to understand the underlying design principles. The outcome, PigeonBot, embodies 42 degrees of freedom that control the position of 40 elastically connected feathers via four servo-actuated wrist and finger joints. Our flight tests demonstrate that the soft feathered wings morph rapidly and robustly under aerodynamic loading. They not only enable wing morphing but also make robot interactions safer, the wing more robust to crashing, and the wing reparable via “preening.” In flight tests, we found that both asymmetric wrist and finger motion can initiate turn maneuvers—evidence that birds may use their fingers to steer in flight.

[1]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus , 2016, Current Biology.

[2]  David Lentink,et al.  Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion , 2017, Interface Focus.

[3]  David Lentink,et al.  How pigeons couple three-dimensional elbow and wrist motion to morph their wings , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Comparison of Visually Guided Flight in Insects and Birds , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Graham K. Taylor,et al.  Soaring and manoeuvring flight of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis , 2011 .

[6]  Kazuaki Nagayama,et al.  Tensile properties of vascular smooth muscle cells: bridging vascular and cellular biomechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  C. Pennycuick A wind tunnel study of gliding flight in the pigeon Columba livia , 1968 .

[8]  Soon-Jo Chung,et al.  A biomimetic robotic platform to study flight specializations of bats , 2017, Science Robotics.

[9]  C. Pennycuick Power requirements for horizontal flight in the pigeon Columba livia , 1968 .

[10]  J. L. Leeuwen,et al.  How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings , 2006, Nature.

[11]  E. Nissim Effect of control surface mass unbalance on the stability of a closed-loop active control system , 1989 .

[12]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[13]  A. M. Berg,et al.  Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia) , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  Joseph W Bahlman,et al.  Design and characterization of a multi-articulated robotic bat wing , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  M Kovač,et al.  Launching the AquaMAV: bioinspired design for aerial–aquatic robotic platforms , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[16]  Mohammad H. Sadraey Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach , 2012 .

[17]  Aimy Wissa,et al.  An experimental study of an airfoil with a bio-inspired leading edge device at high angles of attack , 2017 .

[18]  M Di Luca,et al.  Bioinspired morphing wings for extended flight envelope and roll control of small drones , 2017, Interface Focus.

[19]  W. Thomson Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[20]  David Lentink,et al.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  J. Rüegg,et al.  Smooth muscle tone. , 1971, Physiological reviews.

[22]  David Lentink,et al.  A new low-turbulence wind tunnel for animal and small vehicle flight experiments , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[23]  David Lentink,et al.  How flight feathers stick together to form a continuous morphing wing , 2020, Science.

[24]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design , 1979 .

[25]  A. Carruthers,et al.  Wing Morphing in Insects, Birds and Bats: Mechanism and Function , 2012 .

[26]  Robert G Hoey,et al.  Exploring bird aerodynamics using radio-controlled models , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[27]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Renaissance of Aeroelasticity and Its Future , 1999 .

[28]  Jorn A. Cheney,et al.  Membrane muscle function in the compliant wings of bats , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[29]  Tobin L Hieronymus,et al.  Flight feather attachment in rock pigeons (Columba livia): covert feathers and smooth muscle coordinate a morphing wing , 2016, Journal of anatomy.

[30]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Robird: A Robotic Bird of Prey , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[31]  Johan Larsson,et al.  The prospect of using large eddy and detached eddy simulations in engineering design, and the research required to get there , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Terminal attack trajectories of peregrine falcons are described by the proportional navigation guidance law of missiles , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Jing-Shan Zhao,et al.  A theory of degrees of freedom for mechanisms , 2004 .

[34]  David Lentink,et al.  Exploring the biofluiddynamics of swimming and flight , 2008 .