Duplication of the fusion of TMPRSS2 to ERG sequences identifies fatal human prostate cancer

New predictive markers for managing prostate cancer are urgently required because of the highly variable natural history of this disease. At the time of diagnosis, Gleason score provides the gold standard for assessing the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. However, the recent discovery of TMPRSS2 fusions to the ERG gene in prostate cancer raises the possibility of using alterations at the ERG locus as additional mechanism-based prognostic indicators. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were used to assess ERG gene status in a cohort of 445 prostate cancers from patients who had been conservatively managed. The FISH assays detected separation of 5′ (labelled green) and 3′ (labelled red) ERG sequences, which is a consequence of the TMPRSS2–ERG fusion, and additionally identify interstitial deletion of genomic sequences between the tandemly located TMPRSS2 and ERG gene sequences on chromosome 21. Cancers lacking ERG alterations exhibited favourable cause-specific survival (90% survival at 8 years). We identify a novel category of prostate cancers, characterized by duplication of the fusion of TMPRSS2 to ERG sequences together with interstitial deletion of sequences 5′ to ERG (called ‘2+Edel’), which by comparison exhibited extremely poor cause-specific survival (hazard ratio=6.10, 95% confidence ratio=3.33–11.15, P<0.001, 25% survival at 8 years). In multivariate analysis, ‘2+Edel’ provided significant prognostic information (P=0.003) in addition to that provided by Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis. Other individual categories of ERG alteration were associated with intermediate or good prognosis. We conclude that determination of ERG gene status, including duplication of the fusion of TMPRSS2 to ERG sequences in 2+Edel, allows stratification of prostate cancer into distinct survival categories.

[1]  G. Jenster,et al.  TMPRSS2:ERG fusion by translocation or interstitial deletion is highly relevant in androgen-dependent prostate cancer, but is bypassed in late-stage androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[2]  D. Fryback,et al.  Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[3]  Juni Palmgren,et al.  A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Moss,et al.  A UK‐based investigation of inter‐ and intra‐observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies , 2006, Histopathology.

[5]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Detection rates of high‐grade prostate cancer during subsequent screening visits. Results of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[6]  R. Eeles,et al.  Diversity of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in the human prostate , 2007, Oncogene.

[7]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localised prostate cancer , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  S. Yao,et al.  Understanding and appreciating overdiagnosis in the PSA era. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Pathology of Prostate Cancer Precursors , 2000, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[10]  J. Epstein,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.

[11]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  TMPRSS2 fusions with oncogenic ETS factors in prostate cancer involve unbalanced genomic rearrangements and are associated with HDAC1 and epigenetic reprogramming. , 2006, Cancer research.

[12]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1986 .

[13]  L. Klotz,et al.  Expression of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer cells is an important prognostic factor for cancer progression , 2007, Cancer biology & therapy.

[14]  A. Hanlon,et al.  The Gleason score shift: score four and seven years ago. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  G. Chodak,et al.  Natural history of early localized prostate cancer. , 2004, JAMA.

[16]  Rosalind Eeles,et al.  Transcription factor E2F3 overexpressed in prostate cancer independently predicts clinical outcome , 2004, Oncogene.

[17]  Paul W Dickman,et al.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  H. Frierson,et al.  Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years , 2002, Cancer.

[19]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Unlocking pathology archives for molecular genetic studies: a reliable method to generate probes for chromogenic and fluorescent in situ hybridization , 2006, Laboratory Investigation.

[20]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.

[21]  I. Panagopoulos,et al.  Confirmation of the high frequency of the TMPRSS2/ERG fusion gene in prostate cancer , 2006 .

[22]  J. Tchinda,et al.  TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-associated deletions provide insight into the heterogeneity of prostate cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[23]  Bostwick Dg,et al.  Predictive factors in prostate cancer: current concepts from the 1999 College of American Pathologists Conference on Solid Tumor Prognostic Factors and the 1999 World Health Organization Second International Consultation on Prostate Cancer. , 1999 .

[24]  J. Tchinda,et al.  Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. , 2006, Science.

[25]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion associated with lethal prostate cancer in a watchful waiting cohort , 2007 .

[26]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[27]  R. Thisted,et al.  Results of conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  A. Evans,et al.  Three-color FISH analysis of TMPRSS2/ERG fusions in prostate cancer indicates that genomic microdeletion of chromosome 21 is associated with rearrangement. , 2006, Neoplasia.

[29]  Arul M Chinnaiyan,et al.  TMPRSS2:ETV4 gene fusions define a third molecular subtype of prostate cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[30]  C. Foster,et al.  Pathology of benign prostatic hyperplasia , 2000, The Prostate. Supplement.

[31]  James A Hanley,et al.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  Takaaki Sano,et al.  A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States. , 2005, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[33]  J. Adolfsson,et al.  Deferred treatment of clinically localized low-grade prostate cancer: actual 10-year and projected 15-year follow-up of the Karolinska series. , 1998, Urology.

[34]  Michael Ittmann,et al.  Expression of variant TMPRSS2/ERG fusion messenger RNAs is associated with aggressive prostate cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.