The Impact Of Lecture Capture On Student Performance In Business Courses

This paper examines the effect of the e-learning technology of lecture capture on the performance of undergraduate business students in business law, economics, finance, and management courses. The sample consists of 890 student observations at a midsized regional institution located in the Southwestern region of the United States. The dependent variable is percentage score on a comprehensive final exam in advanced business courses. The empirical model controls for effort, grade point average, standardized test scores (SAT/ACT), and instruction mode. Demographic variables are gender, ethnic background, age, major, and transfer students. Effort measured via homework score, grade point average, ability measured via standardized test scores, academic major, and access to lecture capture are the five model variables that are positive and statistically significant. Age, classification as a transfer student, and online courses without lecture capture are the three statistically significant variables with a negative coefficient. The demographic variables associated with African-American, Hispanic, and gender are not statistically significant determinants of performance on the final exams. The results indicate that students completing business courses with access to lecture capture score approximately three percent higher on the final exam, holding other factors constant.

[1]  Predrag Pale,et al.  Assessing the learning potential and students' perception of rich lecture captures , 2014, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  John F. Dawson,et al.  Use of Lecture Capture in Higher Education - Lessons from the Trenches , 2014 .

[3]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system , 2013 .

[4]  D. Bennett,et al.  Teaching College Microeconomics: Online vs. Traditional Classroom Instruction. , 2013 .

[5]  Ellen G. Smyth,et al.  Enhancing Instruction with Visual Media: Utilizing Video and Lecture Capture , 2013 .

[6]  Ron Owston,et al.  Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: Student perceptions and academic performance , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Joanne B. Sheridan,et al.  Assessment Of Student Performance And Attitudes For Courses Taught Online Versus Onsite , 2011 .

[8]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning , 2010, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  William Wresch,et al.  Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  Ned Kock,et al.  Media Naturalness and Online Learning: Findings Supporting Both the Significant- and No-Significant-Difference Perspectives , 2007 .

[11]  Neil Terry,et al.  Assessing Instruction Modes for Master of Business Administration (MBA) Courses , 2007 .

[12]  Mary F. Fortune,et al.  A Comparison of Online (High Tech) and Traditional (High Touch) Learning in Business Communication Courses in Silicon Valley , 2006 .

[13]  Bruce D. Bagamery,et al.  Determinants of Success on the ETS Business Major Field Exam for Students in an Undergraduate Multisite Regional University Business Program , 2005 .

[14]  John Kane,et al.  "No Significant Distance" between Face-to-Face and Online Instruction: Evidence from Principles of Economics , 2004 .

[15]  David L. Duhon,et al.  Evaluating and Improving Student Achievement in Business Programs: The Effective Use of Standardized Assessment Tests , 2003 .

[16]  Joel P. Bowman It's Not Easy Being Green: Evaluating Student Performance in Online Business Communication Courses , 2003 .

[17]  Charlotte L. Neuhauser Learning Style and Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction , 2002 .

[18]  B. W. Brown,et al.  Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics , 2002 .

[19]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Using the ETS Major Field Test in Business: Implications for Assessment , 2001 .

[20]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[21]  S. Douglas,et al.  Estimating Educational Production Functions with Correction for Drops , 1995 .

[22]  John F. Chizmar,et al.  Testing the Specification of Economic Learning Equations , 1980 .

[23]  W. I. Davisson,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction in Economic Education , 1979 .

[24]  Cassandra DiRienzo,et al.  ONLINE VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE: DOES DELIVERY METHOD MATTER FOR UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS SCHOOL LEARNING? , 2014 .

[25]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2013 .

[26]  Thomas L. Martin,et al.  Assessing Student Performance and Perceptions in Lecture Capture vs. Face-to-Face Course Delivery , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[27]  Educause 7 Things You Should Know About...Lecture Capture , 2008 .

[28]  M. Carter,et al.  TEACHING PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS: INTERNET VS. TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION , 2007 .

[29]  Stephen D. Lewis,et al.  Is Online Education the Solution , 2001 .

[30]  Robert L. Moore,et al.  Exploring the Gender Gap on the GRE Subject Test in Economics , 1995 .

[31]  Jane S. Lopus,et al.  The Lake Wobegon effect in student self-reported data , 1994 .

[32]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  Research on Teaching College Economics: A Survey , 1979 .