The role of globally dispersed knowledge in explaining performance outcomes

Purpose – Integrating insights from the literatures on internationalization and knowledge externalities, we posit that the reservoirs of scientific knowledge residing in different locations around the world have significant power in explaining interfirm performance variations. We assert that the ability to access and exploit such intangible resources differs considerably across multinationals, according to both firm-specific and exogenously determined factors. Methodology – Unlike previous research that typically focuses on knowledge flows within one nation or between two countries, our statistical analysis combines firm-level data with industry-level information on 18 countries and 15 manufacturing sectors. Findings and implications – The empirical findings indicate that the performance-enhancing effect of global knowledge reservoirs is positive and often higher than that of a firm's own knowledge. Whereas some multinationals excel at exploiting such intangible resources, others fail to do so successfully. In this respect, the results indicate that a firm's ability to benefit from global knowledge reservoirs is positively associated with its degree of international diversification, the intensity of its own research efforts, and exogenously determined opportunities pertaining to different technological domains.

[1]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[2]  Jan Hendrik Fisch,et al.  Investment in new foreign subsidiaries under receding perception of uncertainty , 2008 .

[3]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations , 2008 .

[4]  William Hallagan,et al.  Effects of firm resources on growth in multinationality , 2007 .

[5]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  International diversification, subsidiary performance, and the mobility of knowledge resources , 2007 .

[6]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms , 2007 .

[7]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms , 2006 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation , 2006 .

[9]  Yingqi Wei,et al.  Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China's manufacturing sector , 2006 .

[10]  Kyle J. Mayer Spillovers And Governance: An Analysis Of Knowledge And Reputational Spillovers In Information Technology , 2006 .

[11]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[12]  P. Buckley,et al.  A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises , 2004 .

[13]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE S-CURVE HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[14]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms , 2003 .

[15]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities , 2002 .

[17]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[18]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Technology Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry , 2001 .

[19]  Katharina Wakelin,et al.  Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[20]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[21]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[22]  D. Harhoff R&D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, and Productivity Growth — Evidence from German Panel Data , 2000 .

[23]  Witold J. Henisz,et al.  Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[25]  Kannan Ramaswamy,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship Between Multinationality and Performance , 1999 .

[26]  M. Hitt,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[27]  W Kuemmerle,et al.  Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[28]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[29]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Goverance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities , 1996 .

[30]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[31]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  R&D Spillovers and Global Growth , 1996, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[33]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[34]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1996 .

[35]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[36]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  International R&D Spillovers between U.S. And Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors , 1994 .

[37]  E. Helpman,et al.  International R&D Spillovers , 1993, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Innovation and the Sectoral Sources of UK Productivity Growth , 1991 .

[39]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[40]  Stephen J. Kobrin,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL INTEGRATION , 1991 .

[41]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth , 1990 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[43]  Akira Goto,et al.  R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries , 1989 .

[44]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[45]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY AND INTERNATIONALIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MNE PERFORMANCE , 1989 .

[46]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies , 1987 .

[47]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth , 1982 .

[48]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[49]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[50]  N. Rosenberg Science, Invention and Economic Growth , 1974 .

[51]  R. Salomon,et al.  Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting , 2008 .

[52]  Sumit K. Kundu,et al.  A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector , 2003 .

[53]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[54]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[55]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .