Beyond advertising: New infrastructures for publishing integrated research objects

1 NeuroDataScience–ORIGAMI Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2 The International Interactive Computing Collaboration (2i2c), Berkeley, California, United States of America, 3 International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 4 NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 5 Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 6 Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 7 Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

[1]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Pan-neuro: interactive computing at scale with BRAIN datasets , 2021 .

[2]  J. Perkel,et al.  Reactive, reproducible, collaborative: computational notebooks evolve , 2021, Nature.

[3]  J. Poline,et al.  On the open-source landscape of PLOS Computational Biology , 2021, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  In defense of decentralized research data management , 2021, Neuroforum.

[5]  Kathleen Searles,et al.  Using social media to promote academic research: Identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work , 2020, PloS one.

[6]  Guillaume Maze,et al.  The Pangeo Ecosystem: Interactive Computing Tools for the Geosciences: Benchmarking on HPC , 2019, HUST/SE-HER/WIHPC@SC.

[7]  Barbara McGillivray,et al.  The citation advantage of linking publications to research data , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  Anisha Keshavan,et al.  From the Wet Lab to the Web Lab: A Paradigm Shift in Brain Imaging Research , 2019, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  Bodo M Stern,et al.  A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences , 2019, PLoS biology.

[10]  Daniel S. Katz,et al.  Publish Your Software: Introducing the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) , 2018, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[11]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  From data sharing to data publishing , 2018 .

[12]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  Neuron NeuroView An International Laboratory for Systems and Computational Neuroscience , 2018 .

[13]  Todd A. Carpenter,et al.  What Constitutes Peer Review of Data: A survey of published peer review guidelines , 2017, ArXiv.

[14]  Michael Piotrowski,et al.  Future Publishing Formats , 2016, DocEng.

[15]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[16]  Shoaib Sufi,et al.  Toward standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Schema.org: Evolution of Structured Data on the Web , 2015, ACM Queue.

[18]  Tal Yarkoni,et al.  Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[19]  David L Donoho,et al.  An invitation to reproducible computational research. , 2010, Biostatistics.

[20]  Tim Head,et al.  Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale , 2018, SciPy.

[21]  et al.,et al.  Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows , 2016, ELPUB.

[22]  Louise Hall,et al.  Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..