Penile lenghthening original technique using a pubo-cavernous spacer. Long term results from a series of over 200 patients.

INTRODUCTION We report our long experience in the surgical treatment of patients requesting penile lengthening by suspensory ligament release and placement of a custom-made soft silicone pubo-cavernous spacer. The aim was to show that with this surgical technique the results obtained are maintained over time. It is crucial to achieve postoperative satisfaction of these patients who show fragility and self-esteem problems. METHODS From 1999 to 2020, we treated 245 patients with congenital or acquired penile brevity. We carefully analysed the preoperative and postoperative (at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months) penile size of the patients to evaluate whether this technique could allow the long-term maintenance of aesthetic results. We also assessed preoperative erectile function and we focused on the psychological aspects to avoid surgery in patients with dysmorphophobia. This original technique involves the section of the suspensory ligament and the implantation of a silicone spacer between the pubic symphysis and the corpora cavernosa. This spacer is conformed to the patient anatomy and maintains the relationship between the anatomical structures unchanged over time. Sexual self-esteem and patient satisfaction were assessed with the APPSSI questionnaire. RESULTS The mean increase in penile length was about 2.5 cm in flaccid state and 1.9 cm in stretched state. There were no injuries of the neurovascular bundle or urethra, and no erectile dysfunction was noted. These results persisted at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months without significant differences. Over 80% of patients stated that they were completely satisfied with the results obtained. This satisfaction remained stable along follow up. CONCLUSION The section of the suspensory ligament and the implant of the soft silicone spacer provide real penis elongation with satisfactory results that persist over time. This technique avoids the frequent complication of short-term shortening due to the scar adhesions of the edges of the dissected ligament. The high aesthetic satisfaction of patients is stable at controls at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months.

[1]  G. Sharp,et al.  Sociocultural Influences on Men's Penis Size Perceptions and Decisions to Undergo Penile Augmentation: A Qualitative Study. , 2019, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[2]  J. Gillis,et al.  A review of penile elongation surgery , 2017, Translational andrology and urology.

[3]  G. Muir,et al.  Relationship between self-discrepancy and worries about penis size in men with body dysmorphic disorder. , 2016, Body image.

[4]  J. Hodsoll,et al.  Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men , 2015, BJU international.

[5]  D. Kozyrakis,et al.  Is V-Y plasty necessary for penile lengthening? Girth enhancement and increased length solely through circumcision: description of a novel technique. , 2013, Asian journal of andrology.

[6]  S. Vasan,et al.  Penile lengthening procedure with V-Y advancement flap and an interposing silicone sheath: A novel methodology , 2012, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[7]  Y. Har-Shai,et al.  A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size: surgical techniques, success, and complications. , 2008, European urology.

[8]  S. Honig,et al.  Penile size and penile enlargement surgery: a review , 2008, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[9]  S. Minhas,et al.  Penile suspensory ligament division for penile augmentation: indications and results. , 2006, European urology.

[10]  K. Shaeer,et al.  Minimizing the losses in penile lengthening: "V-Y half-skin half-fat advancement flap" and "T-closure" combined with severing the suspensory ligament. , 2006, The journal of sexual medicine.

[11]  S. Athanasiadis,et al.  Augmentation phalloplasty surgery for penile dysmorphophobia in young adults: considerations regarding patient selection, outcome evaluation and techniques applied. , 2005, European urology.

[12]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures , 2002, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[13]  S. Perovic,et al.  Penile surgery and reconstruction , 2002, Current opinion in urology.