Effects of crystalline form on the tableting compression mechanism of phenobarbital polymorphs.

The effects of the polymorphic form on the compression mechanism of forms A, B, and F of phenobarbital were investigated using a compression simulator, mercury porosimetry, X-ray diffraction analysis, BET gas absorption method, and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) photography. The order of tablet hardness obtained from all phenobarbital polymorphs was form A > form B > form F in accordance with that of the specific surface area. The Cooper and Eaton method was applied to evaluate two individual compression processes: particle rearrangement (phase I) and fragmentation and/or deformation (phase II). The parameters for compression processes were calculated using a nonlinear regression analyses program, and the compression energies of phases I and II were calculated from these parameters. The relationship between specific surface area after compression and compression energy at phase I showed a good linear correlation, but their ratio did not. In contrast, the specific surface area ratio showed a linear relationship with the compression energy on phase II, but again the ratio of these two parameters did not. The tablet hardness showed a linear relationship with the specific surface area ratio, but not with the specific surface area. Again, the ratio of these two parameters did not show a linear relationship.

[1]  N Kaneniwa,et al.  Effect of compression temperature on the consolidation mechanism of chlorpropamide polymorphs. , 1995, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  C. Nyström,et al.  Studies on direct compression of tablets XVII. Porosity—pressure curves for the characterization of volume reduction mechanisms in powder compression , 1986 .

[3]  T. Nagai,et al.  Dissolution Phenomena of Organic Medicinals involving Simultaneous Phase Changes , 1969 .

[4]  E. Doelker,et al.  Methodology for a Better Evaluation of the Relation Between Mechanical Strength of Solids and Polymorphic Form , 1989, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[5]  R. Mesley,et al.  The polymorphism of phenobarbitone , 1968, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[6]  N. Pilpel,et al.  Effects of temperature on the tensile strength of pharmaceutical powders , 1978, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[7]  N Kaneniwa,et al.  Effects of the Mechanical Energy of Multi‐tableting Compression on the Polymorphic Transformations of Chlorpropamide , 1989, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[8]  J. A. Hersey,et al.  Density changes in lactose tablets. , 1973, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  A. R. Cooper,et al.  Compaction Behavior of Several Ceramic Powders , 1962 .

[10]  O. Corrigan,et al.  Physicochemical Properties of Spray Dried Drugs: Phenobarbitone and Hydroflumethiazide , 1983 .

[11]  T Nakagawa,et al.  A pharmacokinetic analysis program (multi) for microcomputer. , 1981, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[12]  M. Otsuka,et al.  Effect of geometric factors on hydration kinetics of theophylline anhydrate tablets. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Studies on direct compression of tablets. XL Characterization of particle fragmentation during compaction by permeametry measurements of tablets , 1985 .

[14]  G. Bolhuis,et al.  Increased binding capacity and flowability of α‐lactose monohydrate after dehydration , 1983, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[15]  B. Lilley,et al.  Deformation of Particles during Briquetting , 1970, Nature.

[16]  J. Newton,et al.  Effect of particle size and speed of compaction on density changes in tablets of crystalline and spray-dried lactose. , 1971, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  F. Pisano,et al.  Polymorphism of phenylbutazone: properties and compressional behavior of crystals. , 1977, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  Eric Doelker,et al.  Polymorphic Transformation of Some Drugs Under Compression , 1985 .