Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters.

It is generally assumed that the mutual, but asymmetric, suppression of the components in binary taste mixtures is an invariant property of the human psychophysical response to such mixtures. However, taste intensities have been shown to vary as a function of individual differences in sensitivity, indexed by the perceived bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). To determine if these variations in taste perception influence taste mixture interactions, groups of PROP super-, medium- and non-tasters assessed four binary taste mixtures: sweet-bitter [sucrose/quinine hydrochloride (QHCl)], sweet-sour (sucrose/citric acid), salty-bitter (NaCl/QHCl) and salty-sour (NaCl/citric acid). In each experiment, subjects received factorial combinations of four levels of each of two tastants and rated individual taste intensities and overall mixture intensity. For each taste quality, super-tasters typically gave higher ratings than either medium- or non-tasters, who tended not to differ. There were also group differences in the interactions of the mixtures' components. Super-tasters rated the overall intensity of the mixtures, most likely reflecting integration of the taste components, as greater than medium- and non-tasters, who again showed few differences. In sweet-bitter mixtures, non-tasters failed to show the suppression of sweetness intensity by the highest QHCl concentration that was evident in super- and medium-tasters. These data show that the perception of both tastes and binary taste mixture interactions varies as a function of PROP taster status, but that this may only be evident when three taster groups are clearly distinguished from one another.

[1]  H. Moskowitz Perceptual changes in taste mixtures , 1972 .

[2]  K. Tie,et al.  Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil , 1983 .

[4]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[5]  H. Lawless Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. , 1979, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  The perception of the taste of KCl, NaCl and quinineHCl is not related to PROP-sensitivity , 1991 .

[7]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Young women's food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[9]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[10]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Two-stimulus versus one-stimulus procedure in the framework of functional measurement: a comparative investigation using quinine HCl/NaCl mixtures , 1992 .

[11]  David J. Mela Bitter taste intensity: the effect of tastant and thiourea taster status , 1989 .

[12]  B. Green,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties , 1993 .

[13]  I. J. Miller,et al.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures , 1990 .

[15]  R. Frank,et al.  Intensity and hedonic judgments of taste mixtures: an information integration analysis , 1986 .

[16]  E. Leach,et al.  Comparison of bitterness of caffeine and quinine by a time – intensity procedure , 1986 .

[17]  J. Kamen,et al.  Interactions of suprathreshold taste stimuli. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  A. L. Fox The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and Taste. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Interactions between stimuli with different taste qualities. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[20]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine , 1975, Nature.

[21]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  V. Duffy,et al.  PROP (6‐n‐Propylthiouracil) Supertasters and the Saltiness of NaCl a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1979, Science.

[24]  D. G. Laing Perception of complex smells and tastes , 1989 .

[25]  C L Rock,et al.  The influence of genetic taste markers on food acceptance. , 1995, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[26]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Psychophysical Measurement of 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste Perception a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Kroeze Is taste mixture suppression a peripheral or central event , 1989 .