Building a bridge between distributed systems theory and commercial practice

There is a significant chasm that exists between the distributed systems research community and the commercial marketplace. The call for papers for the FuDiCo conference summarized it beautifully.

[1]  Victoria Ungureanu,et al.  Law-governed interaction: a coordination and control mechanism for heterogeneous distributed systems , 2000, TSEM.

[2]  Hans Eriksson,et al.  MBONE: the multicast backbone , 1994, CACM.

[3]  Victoria Ungureanu,et al.  A mechanism for establishing policies for electronic commerce , 1998, Proceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183).

[4]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Resilient overlay networks , 2001, SOSP.

[5]  Felix C. Freiling,et al.  Modular fair exchange protocols for electronic commerce , 1999, Proceedings 15th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC'99).

[6]  David M. Eyers,et al.  A Coverage-Determination Mechanism for Checking Business Contracts against Organizational Policies , 2002, TES.

[7]  Santosh K. Shrivastava,et al.  Distributed object middleware to support dependable information sharing between organisations , 2002, Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.

[8]  Morris Sloman,et al.  A survey of trust in internet applications , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Santosh K. Shrivastava,et al.  A CORBA Compliant Transactional Workflow System for Internet Applications , 1998 .

[10]  N. Asokan,et al.  Asynchronous protocols for optimistic fair exchange , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.98CB36186).