Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention

The cognitive processes at work in masked priming experiments are usually considered automatic and independent of attention. We provide evidence against this view. Three behavioral experiments demonstrate that the occurrence of unconscious priming in a number-comparison task is determined by the allocation of temporal attention to the time window during which the prime-target pair is presented. Both response-congruity priming and physical repetition priming vanish when temporal attention is focused away from this time window. These findings are inconsistent with the concept of a purely automatic spreading of activation during masked priming.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[2]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[3]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[4]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. , 1982 .

[5]  L. Weiskrantz.  Blindsight : a case study and implications , 1986 .

[6]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[7]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Posner.  Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  Images of mind , 1994 .

[10]  Luis J. Fuentes,et al.  The Role of the Anterior Attention System in Semantic Processing of both Foveal and Parafoveal Words , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Measuring the Relative Magnitude of Unconscious Influences , 1995, Consciousness and Cognition.

[13]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[14]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation , 1996, Science.

[15]  R. Mcglinchey-Berroth.  Visual information processing in hemispatial neglect , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Expe: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments , 1997 .

[17]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition : Effort after meaning but not (necessarily) meaning after effort , 1997 .

[18]  S Dehaene,et al.  A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[20]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[21]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Attention without awareness in blindsight , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Klinger,et al.  Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Joel Lachter,et al.  Unattended words are not identified , 2000 .

[25]  D. Wentura,et al.  Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Parts Outweigh the Whole (Word) in Unconscious Analysis of Meaning , 2000, Psychological science.

[27]  James H. Neely,et al.  Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. , 2001 .

[28]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Masson,et al.  Prime Validity Affects Masked Repetition Priming: Evidence for an Episodic Resource Account of Priming , 2001 .

[30]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  The nature of remembering : essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder , 2001 .

[31]  M. Damian,et al.  Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.