The economic impacts of river rehabilitation: A regional Input–Output analysis

Abstract We developed a model to predict the impacts of river rehabilitation activities on the local economy. The model is based on the Input–Output analysis technique and was applied to the planned rehabilitation project for the River Thur in northern Switzerland, along the 4 km stretch between the communities of Burglen and Weinfelden. We estimated changes in local employment and local economic output resulting from government spending on rehabilitation, associated changes in adjacent land use, and increased recreational activity. Accounting for land use changes required a modification of the conventional Input–Output analysis technique which should be of general interest. We accounted for uncertainty in the data and in some of the model assumptions by using a probabilistic formulation and propagating uncertainty through the model equations. As time-consuming local surveys were beyond the scope of this study, we used the Location Quotient non-survey technique to construct the local technical coefficients from national data and local employment data. This implies that the model can be applied quite easily to a different study area in Switzerland as long as local employment data are available. For each CHF 1 million expenditure per year on rehabilitation activities in our study region, we estimate an extra 8 fulltime employment equivalents (standard deviation, σ  = 0.4 fte) and an increased output of CHF 1.4 million ( σ  = CHF 0.05 million). The low uncertainty of these estimates can be partly attributed to the structure of Input–Output analysis and partly to the fact that we estimated changes in the economic output, rather than output itself. In addition to the above impacts, we estimate that increased recreational use of the area will increase output by as much as CHF 0.17 million ( σ  = CHF 0.12 million) and employment by as much as 1.7 fulltime employment equivalents ( σ  = 1.3 fte), depending on the specific rehabilitation option selected.

[1]  Tzeng-Shwu Lieu Alternative shortcuts for output multipliers in input-output models , 1983 .

[2]  Robert E. Garhart,et al.  NONSURVEY INPUT‐OUTPUT ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES: EVIDENCE ON THE STRUCTURE OF ERRORS , 1987 .

[3]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Does high forecast uncertainty preclude effective decision support? , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Cheol-Joo Cho,et al.  The economic-energy-environmental policy problem: An application of the interactive multiobjective decision method for Chungbuk Province , 1999 .

[5]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis of Input-Output Models , 1988 .

[6]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  STAKEHOLDER VALUES IN DECISION SUPPORT FOR RIVER REHABILITATION , 2003 .

[7]  N. Hanley,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment , 1994 .

[8]  F. Kienast,et al.  River rehabilitation in Switzerland: scope, challenges and research , 2003 .

[9]  Peter D. Blair,et al.  Input-Output Analysis , 2021 .

[10]  P. Reichert,et al.  Multi‐attribute value theory as a framework for conflict resolution in river rehabilitation , 2005 .

[11]  W. Leontief Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States , 1936 .

[12]  J. Round,et al.  Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence , 1983 .

[13]  P. Berck,et al.  Assessing the Employment Impacts of Environmental and Natural Resource Policy , 2002 .

[14]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[15]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[16]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  G. Petts Perspectives for Ecological Management of Regulated Rivers , 1989 .

[18]  J. Ladenburg,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of the Skjern river restoration in Denmark , 2003 .

[19]  Wen-Huei Chang,et al.  Estimating the Local Economic Impacts of Recreation at Corps of Engineers Projects - 1996 , 1998 .

[20]  Sergio J. Rey,et al.  Uncertainty in Integrated Regional Models , 2004 .

[21]  Robert McDougall,et al.  Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base , 2002 .

[22]  W. I. Morrison,et al.  NONSURVEY INPUT‐OUTPUT TECHNIQUES AT THE SMALL AREA LEVEL: AN EVALUATION , 1974 .

[23]  Andrew M. Isserman,et al.  The Location Quotient Approach to Estimating Regional Economic Impacts , 1977 .

[24]  Carlos Henggeler Antunes,et al.  A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Walter Isard,et al.  Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis , 1998 .

[26]  M. Evans Statistical Distributions , 2000 .