Achieving Cross‐Scale Collaboration for Large Scale Conservation Initiatives

Large-scale conservation requires the involvement of numerous stakeholders to plan for and implement a range of activities across multiple scales. Establishing and sustaining the effective collaborations necessary to achieve this is a key challenge. Utilizing data from a large-scale conservation initiative in the south west of Australia we characterize the interactions between stakeholders as a social network. We employ a novel network theoretical approach to assess the different forms of collaboration, including cross-scale collaboration. We find that the social network predisposes cross-scale collaboration for invasive animal control, an action where coordination of activities is necessary. We find that for revegetation activities there is little evidence of collaboration across scales, but this could be fostered by a subset of stakeholders acting in a “scale-bridging” role. Addressing this will likely improve the effectiveness of revegetation efforts and the outcomes of the broader conservation initiative.

[1]  P. Pattison,et al.  New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models , 2006 .

[2]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Practical Conservation Biology , 2005 .

[3]  Hiroyuki Yokomizo,et al.  The behavior of multiple independent managers and ecological traits interact to determine prevalence of weeds. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Connectivity Conservation Management , 2010 .

[5]  M. Lubell,et al.  Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[6]  Garry Robins,et al.  NETWORK GOVERNANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: CONFLICT AND COOPERATION , 2011 .

[7]  W. Probert,et al.  Conservation Planning with Multiple Organizations and Objectives , 2010, Conservation Biology.

[8]  H. Gichohi,et al.  The Heartland Conservation Process: enhancing biodiversity conservation and livelihoods through landscape-scale conservation planning in Africa , 2009, Oryx.

[9]  Patrick Christie,et al.  Scaling Up to Networks of Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines: Biophysical, Legal, Institutional, and Social Considerations , 2009 .

[10]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems , 2012 .

[11]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[12]  M. Lubell.  Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? , 2004 .

[13]  E. Andersson,et al.  Scale-Crossing Brokers and Network Governance of Urban Ecosystem Services : The Case of Stockholm , 2010 .

[14]  J. Mcdonagh,et al.  Interdisciplinary interpretations and applications of the concept of scale in landscape research. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Jonathan Corcoran,et al.  Scale Mismatches, Conservation Planning, and the Value of Social‐Network Analyses , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Ann Dale,et al.  Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks , 2007 .

[17]  Philippa J. Cohen,et al.  Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands , 2012 .

[18]  K. Vance-Borland,et al.  Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving , 2011 .

[19]  B. Erickson,et al.  Transfer of Knowledge on Agroforestry Management Practices: the Structure of Farmer Advice Networks , 2007 .

[20]  Oran R. Young,et al.  Vertical Interplay among Scale-dependent Environmental and Resource Regimes , 2006 .

[21]  Graham R. Marshall,et al.  Nesting, Subsidiarity, and Community-based environmental Governance beyond the Local Scale , 2007 .

[22]  G. Marshall.  Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance , 2009 .

[23]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Network analysis in conservation biogeography: challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[26]  C. Folke,et al.  Enhancing the Fit through Adaptive Co-management: Creating and Maintaining Bridging Functions for Matching Scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden , 2007 .

[27]  B. Crona,et al.  Conservation Success as a Function of Good Alignment of Social and Ecological Structures and Processes , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  T. Lauber,et al.  Social Networks and Community-Based Natural Resource Management , 2008, Environmental management.

[29]  Garry Robins,et al.  Bayesian analysis for partially observed network data, missing ties, attributes and actors , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[30]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern Africa , 1999 .

[31]  L. Carlsson,et al.  The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance , 2008 .

[32]  J. Fitzsimons,et al.  Linking Australia's landscapes: lessons and opportunities from large-scale conservation networks. , 2013 .

[33]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Mapping Human and Social Dimensions of Conservation Opportunity for the Scheduling of Conservation Action on Private Land , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  Sue V. Briggs,et al.  Nature grows in straight lines—or does she? What are the consequences of the mismatch between human-imposed linear boundaries and ecosystem boundaries? An Australian example , 2002 .

[35]  P. Sabatier.  Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[36]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Approaches to landscape- and seascape-scale conservation planning: convergence, contrasts and challenges , 2009, Oryx.

[37]  Steven M. Manson,et al.  Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human–environment systems , 2008 .

[38]  L. Carlsson,et al.  Network Governance of the Commons , 2007 .

[39]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[40]  S. Kark,et al.  Collaboration among countries in marine conservation can achieve substantial efficiencies , 2013 .

[41]  R. Cowling,et al.  Designing Large‐Scale Conservation Corridors for Pattern and Process , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  F. Berkes.  From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons , 2006 .

[43]  N. Macleod,et al.  Conservation and grazing in Australia’s north-east: the bridled nailtail wallaby , 2012, Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice.

[44]  T. Lauber,et al.  Social Network Dynamics in Collaborative Conservation , 2011 .

[45]  M. Mulrennan,et al.  Toward an integrated marine protected areas policy: connecting the global to the local , 2010 .

[46]  Garry Robins,et al.  Missing data in networks: exponential random graph (p∗) models for networks with non-respondents , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[47]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[48]  R. P. Bixler,et al.  Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.