POTENTIAL OF FULL WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA FOR URBAN AREA CLASSIFICATION – TRANSFER OF CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES BETWEEN MISSIONS

Full-waveform (FWF) LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) systems have their advantage in recording the entire backscattered signal of each emitted laser pulse compared to conventional airborne discrete-return laser scanner systems. The FWF systems can provide point clouds which contain extra attributes like amplitude and echo width, etc. In this study, a FWF data collected in 2010 for Eisenstadt, a city in the eastern part of Austria was used to classify four main classes: buildings, trees, waterbody and ground by employing a decision tree. Point density, echo ratio, echo width, normalised digital surface model and point cloud roughness are the main inputs for classification. The accuracy of the final results, correctness and completeness measures, were assessed by comparison of the classified output to a knowledge-based labelling of the points. Completeness and correctness between 90% and 97% was reached, depending on the class. While such results and methods were presented before, we are investigating additionally the transferability of the classification method (features, thresholds …) to another urban FWF lidar point cloud. Our conclusions are that from the features used, only echo width requires new thresholds. A data-driven adaptation of thresholds is suggested.

[1]  Martin Rutzinger,et al.  Detection of building regions using airborne LiDAR : a new combination of raster and point cloud based GIS methods , 2009 .

[2]  W. Wagner,et al.  3 D VEGETATION MAPPING AND CLASSIFICATION USING FULL-WAVEFORM LASER SCANNING , 2006 .

[3]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Object-Based Point Cloud Analysis of Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Urban Vegetation Classification , 2008, Sensors.

[4]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  B-spline deconvolution for differential target cross-section determination in full-waveform laser scanning data , 2011 .

[5]  Yu-Ching Lin Normalization of Echo Features Derived from Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Martin Rutzinger,et al.  Water classification using 3D airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2009 .

[7]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FULL-WAVEFORM LIDAR DATA FOR CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN AREAS , 2008 .

[8]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Range determination with waveform recording laser systems using a Wiener Filter , 2006 .

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic Detection of Buildings and Changes in Buildings for Updating of Maps , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[10]  K. Tansey,et al.  Backscatter coefficient as an attribute for the classification of full-waveform airborne laser scanning data in urban areas , 2010 .

[11]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Georeferenced Point Clouds: A Survey of Features and Point Cloud Management , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[12]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[13]  George Vosselman,et al.  Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[14]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Full-waveform topographic lidar : State-of-the-art , 2009 .

[15]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  OPALS - A framework for Airborne Laser Scanning data analysis , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[16]  Christian Heipke,et al.  EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC ROAD EXTRACTION , 2007 .