A Local Fast-Reroute mechanism for single node or link protection in hop-by-hop routed networks

Network survivability has become one of the most important QoS (Quality of Service) parameters in IP network-based applications, particularly with regard to real-time multimedia applications. IP-based protection that enable recovery from failure in just a few milliseconds can provide greater network resilience than traditional routing recovery or other lower-layer recovery technologies. This paper proposes an IP protection scheme, called IP Local Fast-Reroute (IPLFRR), for single node or link protection. This scheme works in an intra-area routing domain, providing a simple and efficient solution to improve the survivability of IP networks. Unlike MPLS Fast-Reroute, which requires an extra MPLS layer and related protocols, the proposed scheme is applicable to a network employing conventional IP routing and forwarding. Moreover, our mechanism is capable of preventing service disruptions and packet loss caused by the transient loops that normally occur during reconvergence of the network following a failure. Because the backup next-hops are predetermined, service interruption can be limited to a few milliseconds, which is on par with the failure detection time. Simulation results show that IPLFRR is capable of improving network survivability, following the failure of a single node or link.

[1]  Ross W. Callon,et al.  Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and dual environments , 1990, RFC.

[2]  Michael Menth,et al.  Relaxed multiple routing configurations: IP fast reroute for single and correlated failures , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[3]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measuring ISP topologies with rocketfuel , 2002, TNET.

[4]  Stewart Bryant,et al.  IP Fast Reroute Framework , 2010, RFC.

[5]  Cheng-Shong Wu,et al.  Local Link Protection Scheme in IP Networks , 2007, International Conference on Computational Science.

[6]  Alia Atlas,et al.  Basic Specification for IP Fast Reroute: Loop-Free Alternates , 2008, RFC.

[7]  Mingwei Xu,et al.  Lightweight IP fast reroute with Tunnel-AT , 2010, 2010 IEEE 18th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS).

[8]  Stewart Bryant,et al.  IP Fast Reroute Using Not-via Addresses , 2006 .

[9]  Alia Atlas,et al.  Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels , 2005, RFC.

[10]  Yuan-Sun Chu,et al.  IP Local Node Protection , 2007, 2007 Second International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications (ICSNC 2007).

[11]  Ibrahim Matta,et al.  BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation , 2001, MASCOTS 2001, Proceedings Ninth International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems.

[12]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  IP restoration vs. WDM protection: is there an optimal choice? , 2000, IEEE Netw..

[13]  George C. Polyzos,et al.  Traffic characteristics of the T1 NSFNET backbone , 1993, IEEE INFOCOM '93 The Conference on Computer Communications, Proceedings.

[14]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Framework of spare capacity re-allocation with S-SLSP for mesh WDM networks , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Mingwei Xu,et al.  A Lightweight IP Fast Reroute Algorithm with Tunneling , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[17]  Stewart Bryant,et al.  A Framework for Loop-Free Convergence , 2010, RFC.

[18]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Fault management in IP-over-WDM networks: WDM protection versus IP restoration , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[19]  G. Swallow,et al.  SONET/SDH-like resilience for IP networks: a survey of traffic protection mechanisms , 2004, IEEE Network.

[20]  Chen-Nee Chuah,et al.  Feasibility of IP restoration in a tier 1 backbone , 2004, IEEE Network.

[21]  Gábor Rétvári,et al.  IP Fast ReRoute: Lightweight Not-Via without Additional Addresses , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[22]  Alia Atlas,et al.  U-turn Alternates for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute , 2006 .