Spoken word recognition in toddlers who use cochlear implants.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the time course of spoken word recognition in 2-year-old children who use cochlear implants (CIs) in quiet and in the presence of speech competitors. METHOD Children who use CIs and age-matched peers with normal acoustic hearing listened to familiar auditory labels, in quiet or in the presence of speech competitors, while their eye movements to target objects were digitally recorded. Word recognition performance was quantified by measuring each child's reaction time (i.e., the latency between the spoken auditory label and the first look at the target object) and accuracy (i.e., the amount of time that children looked at target objects within 367 ms to 2,000 ms after the label onset). RESULTS Children with CIs were less accurate and took longer to fixate target objects than did age-matched children without hearing loss. Both groups of children showed reduced performance in the presence of the speech competitors, although many children continued to recognize labels at above-chance levels. CONCLUSION The results suggest that the unique auditory experience of young CI users slows the time course of spoken word recognition abilities. In addition, real-world listening environments may slow language processing in young language learners, regardless of their hearing status.

[1]  V. Marchman,et al.  Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. , 2008, Developmental science.

[2]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[3]  R. Aslin,et al.  Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children , 2000, Cognition.

[4]  A Markides,et al.  Speech levels and speech-to-noise ratios. , 1986, British journal of audiology.

[5]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[6]  M. Dorman,et al.  A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Rochelle S Newman,et al.  The cocktail party effect in infants revisited: listening to one's name in noise. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[8]  R. Miyamoto,et al.  Effects of Age at Implantation in Young Children , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[9]  A. Geers,et al.  Effects of Early Auditory Experience on the Spoken Language of Deaf Children at 3 Years of Age , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Mario A. Svirsky,et al.  Speech Perception Benefits of Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults: A Retrospective Analysis , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[14]  Tina M. Grieco-Calub,et al.  Using the Observer-Based Psychophysical Procedure to Assess Localization Acuity in Toddlers Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  R. Aslin,et al.  Lexical Neighborhoods and the Word-Form Representations of 14-Month-Olds , 2002, Psychological science.

[16]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  The cocktail party effect in infants. , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[18]  P J Blamey,et al.  Variation In Speech Perception Scores Among Children with Cochlear Implants , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[19]  John P. Pinto,et al.  Rapid Gains in Speed of Verbal Processing by Infants in the 2nd Year , 1998 .

[20]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[21]  John P. Pinto,et al.  When half a word is enough: infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. , 2001, Child development.

[22]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D. Thal,et al.  Validity of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories for measuring language abilities in children with cochlear implants. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[24]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[25]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Soha N. Garadat,et al.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R T Miyamoto,et al.  Communication skills in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[28]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Development of Pre-Word-Learning Skills in Infants with Cochlear Implants. , 2001, The Volta review.

[30]  Amy Perfors,et al.  Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[31]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Language Development in Profoundly Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Psychological science.

[32]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Research on Spoken Language Processing Speech Perception Skills of Deaf Infants following Cochlear Implantation: a First Report Speech Perception Skills of Deaf Infants following Cochlear Implantation: a First Report , 2022 .

[33]  M F Dorman,et al.  The Identification of Speech in Noise by Cochlear Implant Patients and Normal‐Hearing Listeners Using 6‐Channel Signal Processors , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[34]  Christine Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss , 1998, Pediatrics.

[35]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[36]  B Robert Peters,et al.  Importance of Age and Postimplantation Experience on Speech Perception Measures in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[37]  J. Niparko,et al.  Tracking Development of Speech Recognition: Longitudinal Data From Hierarchical Assessments in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation Study , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[38]  J. Werker,et al.  Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words , 1999, Cognition.