Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods: a research model.

A historical antagonism between proponents of qualitative methods and quantitative methods has prevented recognition of the benefits to be gained by employing both methods (that is, a multi-method approach) during the same study or program of studies. Increasingly, family therapy researchers have begun to recognize the value of a multi-method approach in bridging the current gaps among theory, research, and practice. However, current writings have yet to move beyond the discussion stage. This article proposes a bidirectional continuum that includes both qualitative and quantitative methods. An ethnographic content analysis approach is presented to illustrate the procedural stages of this continuum. The article ends with a discussion of the challenges in carrying out a bidirectional, multi-method approach and the potential contributions that an integrative research methodology will give both researchers and clinicians.

[1]  A. Gurman.  FAMILY THERAPY RESEARCH AND THE “NEW EPISTEMOLOGY”* , 1983 .

[2]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[3]  T. Clevenger,et al.  ETHNOGRAPHIC CONTENT ANALYSIS OF COUPLE AND THERAPIST PERCEPTIONS IN A REFLECTING TEAM SETTING , 1994 .

[4]  N. Jacobson,et al.  COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MARITAL THERAPY: 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AND PREDICTION OF RELAPSE , 1987 .

[5]  P. Dell.  UNDERSTANDING BATESON AND MATURANA: TOWARD A BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATION FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES* , 1985 .

[6]  J. Gale,et al.  A Conversation Analysis of a Solution-Focused Marital Therapy Session. , 1992 .

[7]  M. Trend,et al.  On The Reconciliation of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses: A Case Study , 1978 .

[8]  A. Bryman.  The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? , 1984 .

[9]  Karl Tbmm.  On Incorporating the Therapist in a Scientific Theory of Family Therapy. , 1986 .

[10]  Robert L. Blake,et al.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in family research. , 1989 .

[11]  W. Firestone.  Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 1987 .

[12]  A. M. Huberman,et al.  Fitting Words to Numbers , 1982 .

[13]  P. Dell.  In defense of "lineal causality". , 1986, Family process.

[14]  M. Yoshioka,et al.  An Ethnography of Couple and Therapist Experiences in Reflecting Team Practice , 1994 .

[15]  D. Sprenkle,et al.  Marriage and Family Therapy: A Decade in Review. , 1990 .

[16]  D. Snyder,et al.  ICONOCLASM VERSUS INNOVATION: BUILDING A SCIENCE OF FAMILY THERAPY-COMMENTS ON MOON, DILLON, AND SPRENKLE , 1991 .

[17]  Deborah R. Dillon,et al.  On Balance and Synergy: Family Therapy and Qualitative Research Revisited. , 1991 .

[18]  M. Mahoney.  Experimental methods and outcome evaluation. , 1978 .

[19]  Howard A. Liddle,et al.  Empirical Values and the Culture of Family Therapy. , 1991 .

[20]  S. Sieber.  The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  David L. Altheide.  Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis , 1987 .

[22]  Deborah R. Dillon,et al.  Family therapy and qualitative research , 1990 .

[23]  P. Dell,et al.  In search of truth: on the way to clinical epistemology. , 1982, Family process.

[24]  C. Shields.  CRITIQUING THE NEW EPISTEMOLOGIES: TOWARDMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF FAMILY THERAPY* , 1986 .

[25]  G. Burlingame,et al.  Systems of family treatment: substance or semantics? , 1988, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  A. Gurman,et al.  The future of marital and family therapy. , 1992 .

[27]  F. Borgen.  Are there necessary linkages between research practices and the philosophy of science , 1984 .