Studying the Safety Impact of Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measures

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology has advanced rapidly in recent years with some automated features already available in vehicles on the market. AVs are expected to reduce traffic crashes as the majority of crashes are related to driver errors, fatigue, alcohol, or drugs. However, very little research has been conducted to estimate the safety impact of AVs. This paper aims to investigate the safety impacts of AVs using a simulation-based surrogate safety measure approach. To this end, safety impacts are explored through the number of conflicts extracted from the VISSIM traffic microsimulator using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). Behaviours of human-driven vehicles (HVs) and AVs (level 4 automation) are modelled within the VISSIM’s car-following model. The safety investigation is conducted for two case studies, that is, a signalised intersection and a roundabout, under various AV penetration rates. Results suggest that AVs improve safety significantly with high penetration rates, even when they travel with shorter headways to improve road capacity and reduce delay. For the signalised intersection, AVs reduce the number of conflicts by 20% to 65% with the AV penetration rates of between 50% and 100% (statistically significant at ). For the roundabout, the number of conflicts is reduced by 29% to 64% with the 100% AV penetration rate (statistically significant at ).

[1]  Xuesong Zhou,et al.  Dynamic programming-based multi-vehicle longitudinal trajectory optimization with simplified car following models , 2017 .

[2]  Graham Currie,et al.  How Many Simulation Runs are Required to Achieve Statistically Confident Results: A Case Study of Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measures , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Nazanin Nader,et al.  Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  Jianshan Zhou,et al.  Modeling chain collisions in vehicular networks with variable penetration rates , 2016 .

[5]  Research on the Impacts of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles ( CAVs ) on Traffic Flow Stage 1 : Evidence Review , .

[6]  M. Sivak,et al.  A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF REAL-WORLD CRASHES INVOLVING SELF-DRIVING VEHICLES , 2015 .

[7]  Sai Chand,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Yan Kuang,et al.  A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[10]  Jun-ichi Imura,et al.  A Vehicle-Intersection Coordination Scheme for Smooth Flows of Traffic Without Using Traffic Lights , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Todd Litman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning , 2015 .

[12]  Xiaobo Qu,et al.  On the Impact of Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles in Improving Freeway Merging: A Modified Intelligent Driver Model-Based Approach , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Wassim G Najm,et al.  Target Crash Population of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[14]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[15]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Cooperative (rather than autonomous) vehicle-highway automation systems , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[16]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[17]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Implications of Connected and Automated Vehicles on the Safety and Operations of Roadway Networks: A Final Report , 2016 .

[18]  Atze Dijkstra,et al.  Do Calculated Conflicts in Microsimulation Model Predict Number of Crashes? , 2010 .

[19]  Suzanne Childress,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[20]  Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.  Risk Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Streams , 2017 .

[21]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Safety: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[22]  Graham Currie,et al.  Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia , 2017 .

[23]  Guizhen Yu,et al.  Surrogate Safety Analysis of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflict at Intersections Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Videos , 2017 .

[24]  Kelvin Chun Keong Goh,et al.  Experimental Microsimulation Modeling of Road Safety Impacts of Bus Priority , 2014 .

[25]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A comparison between PARAMICS and VISSIM in estimating automated field‐measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections , 2016 .

[26]  Raymond Hoogendoorn,et al.  Automated Driving, Traffic Flow Efficiency, and Human Factors , 2014 .

[27]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[28]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Simulation of safety: a review of the state of the art in road safety simulation modelling. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[30]  Graham Currie,et al.  Required traffic micro-simulation runs for reliable multivariate performance estimates , 2016 .

[31]  Brice G. Nichols,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Possible Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .