Towards the Control of Individual Fingers of a Prosthetic Hand Using Surface EMG Signals

The fast pace of development of upper-limb prostheses requires a paradigm shift in EMG-based controls. Traditional control schemes are only capable of providing 2 degrees of freedom, which is insufficient for dexterous control of individual fingers. We present a framework where myoelectric signals from natural hand and finger movements can be decoded with a high accuracy. 32 surface-EMG electrodes were placed on the forearm of an able-bodied subject while performing individual finger movements. Using time-domain feature extraction methods as inputs to a neural network classifier, we show that 12 individuated flexion and extension movements of the fingers can be decoded with an accuracy higher than 98%. To our knowledge, this is the first instance in which such movements have been successfully decoded using surface-EMG. These preliminary findings provide a framework that will allow the results to be extended to non-invasive control of the next generation of upper-limb prostheses for amputees.

[1]  R. Roeschlein,et al.  Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  F. Netter Atlas of Human Anatomy , 1967 .

[3]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Muscle activation patterns and kinetics of human index finger movements. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Edward C. Grahn,et al.  Development of Externally-Powered Prostheses for Persons with Partial Hand Amputations , 2000 .

[6]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[7]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Limb Amputation and Limb Deficiency: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in the United States , 2002, Southern medical journal.

[8]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  Classification of finger activation for use in a robotic prosthesis arm , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  P. Dario,et al.  Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[10]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Sijiang Du,et al.  Temporal vs. spectral approach to feature extraction from prehensile EMG signals , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004..

[12]  M.W. Jiang,et al.  A Method of Recognizing Finger Motion Using Wavelet Transform of Surface EMG Signal , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[13]  R. Weir,et al.  Pilot comparison of surface vs. implanted EMG for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[14]  European Group on Ethics in Science and New Techno,et al.  Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body , 2005 .

[15]  G. Schalk,et al.  The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Mark Huang,et al.  Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Gang Wang,et al.  Classification of surface EMG signals using optimal wavelet packet method based on Davies-Bouldin criterion , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  K.R. Wheeler,et al.  Gesture-based control and EMG decomposition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[19]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (3rd Edition) , 2007 .