Selection and Evolution of Industry

The evolution of industry depends on the selection mechanism, that is, the process of entry and exit of firms and the various factors influencing the entry and exit decisions. Three major factors are most important in the selection process. One is the evolutionary perspective which emphasizes the firm’s ability and competence to alter their market position and hence through strong increasing returns to scale, to alter the market structure significantly. Following the Schumpeterian theory of technological innovations the main source of such increasing returns is the cumulative aspect of innovations, where “size begets size” causes industrial dynamics to be characterized by nonlinear and path dependent processes, where random events like a new technical process may have lasting and irreversible effects on the dynamic evolution of the selection process. Secondly, firms differ significantly in their commitment and ability to innovate. Thus innovations in products and processes are largely endogenous to the firm through R&D investment and learning-by-doing. Thus vigorous innovation has been found to generate more competitive market structures, while innovations requiring large investment generally involve more concentration through large size firms. Also due to the cumulative nature of technological innovations firms that discover new technologies are able to maintain their lead even after the particular technology is obsolete.

[1]  Daniel F. Spulber Capacity, Output, and Sequential Entry , 1981 .

[2]  R. D. Rees Optimum Plant Size in United Kingdom Industries: Some Survivor Estimates , 1973 .

[3]  Boyan Jovanovic Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .

[4]  R. Rogers The minimum optimal steel plant and the survivor technique of cost estimation , 1993 .

[5]  Allyn A. Young,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS , 1928 .

[6]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Economies of Scale , 1958, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[7]  D. Orr,et al.  The Determinants of Entry: A Sudy of the Canadian Manufacturing Industries , 1974 .

[8]  Empirical measurement and analysis of productivity and technological change : applications in high-technology and service industries , 1992 .

[9]  D. Gaskins,et al.  Dynamic limit pricing: Optimal pricing under threat of entry , 1971 .

[10]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age , 2000 .

[11]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Control theory methods in economics , 1997 .

[12]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[13]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  J. Drèze,et al.  On industry equilibrium under uncertainty , 1984 .

[15]  W. Novshek Cournot Equilibrium with Free Entry , 1980 .

[16]  M. Salinger Tobin's q, Unionization, and the Concentration-Profits Relationship , 1984 .

[17]  N. Kaldor Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth , 1961 .

[18]  Jati K. Sengupta New Efficiency Theory , 2003 .

[19]  K. Suzumura Competition, Commitment, And Welfare , 1995 .

[20]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[21]  Ralph A. Winter,et al.  An Economic Theory of Vertical Restraints , 1984 .

[22]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Organization of Industry , 1969 .

[23]  Elettra Agliardi,et al.  Positive Feedback Economies , 1998 .

[24]  J. Bain Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[25]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[26]  Joachim Schwalbach,et al.  Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison , 1991 .

[27]  J. Mata Sunk Costs and the Dynamics of Entry in Portuguese Manufacturing , 1995 .