Conceptualization of a robust performance assessment and evaluation model for consolidating community water systems.

Community water systems (CWS) face significant competing forces for change from decreasing water resource availability, stricter water quality regulations, decreasing federal subsidies, increasing public scrutiny, decreasing financial health, and increasing infrastructure replacement costs. These competing forces necessitate increasing consolidation responses among financially stressed CWS. Consolidation responses allow financially stressed CWS to increase levels of service by taking advantage of economy of scale benefits, such as eliminating service duplications across administration and operational functions. Consolidation responses also promote improved financial accountability among consolidating CWS, especially when operating as integral subsystems of a larger regional drinking water supply (RDWS) system. The goal of this paper is to propose a conceptual model for robust performance assessment and evaluation (PAE) among consolidating CWS. The objectives of this paper are to conceptualize methods for: (1) consistent performance assessment and (2) uniform summative performance evaluation among consolidating CWS. The expected outcome from implementing robust PAE among consolidating CWS is increased levels of service through transparent benchmarking and improved financial accountability. The proposed robust PAE model provides the basis for constructing decision support system (DSS) tools that estimate efficient solutions for allocating limited financial resources among consolidating CWS. The paper is a significant departure from current CWS PAE approaches in two ways. First, it provides a goal-oriented approach for robust PAE among consolidating CWS. Second, it constructs efficiency-based performance metrics to temporally and spatially monitor the degree of attainment of the RDWS systems' goal.

[1]  Caulfield,et al.  Early Federal Guidelines for Water Resource Evaluation , 2000 .

[2]  Harry P. Hatry,et al.  How effective are your community services? : Procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of municipal services , 1977 .

[3]  Noel Sproles,et al.  Formulating measures of effectiveness , 2002 .

[4]  David N. Ammons Accountability for performance : measurement and monitoring in local government , 1995 .

[5]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  An Assessment of Water Demand Management Options from a Systems Approach , 2000 .

[6]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Economies of scale in community water systems , 2006 .

[7]  Khaled Kheireldin,et al.  Multi-Criteria Approach for Evaluating Long Term Water Strategies , 2001 .

[8]  Jeffrey W. Rogers,et al.  A standard efficiency metric for evaluating the performance of community water systems , 2005 .

[9]  J. Alan Roberson,et al.  Developing Performance Measures for the SDWA Regulatory Program: Melding what's Countable with What Counts , 2006 .

[10]  Garrick E Louis,et al.  Risk and opportunity in upgrading the US drinking water infrastructure system. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Ine H J Van der Fels-Klerx,et al.  Elicitation of Quantitative Data from a Heterogeneous Expert Panel: Formal Process and Application in Animal Health , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Tony P. Urquhart,et al.  Establishing Service Levels—the Driving Force of a Utility , 2005 .

[13]  Jeffrey W. Rogers,et al.  Method for Comparative Performance Assessment and Evaluation of Consolidating Community Water Systems as a Regional Water System , 2007 .

[14]  A. Ubbels,et al.  Collaborative planning in integrated water resources management: the use of decisions support tools , 2001 .

[15]  David N. Ammons Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards , 1996 .

[16]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Water Companies' Service Performance and Environmental Trade-offs , 2002 .

[17]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Applying voting theory in natural resource management: a case of multiple-criteria group decision support. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  S. Hajkowicz,et al.  An Evaluation of Multiple Objective Decision Support Weighting Techniques in Natural Resource Management , 2000 .

[19]  Ali Asgary,et al.  A Performance Index for Assessing Urban Water Systems: A Fuzzy Inference Approach , 2006 .

[20]  C. Sullivan The Potential for Calculating a Meaningful Water Poverty Index , 2001 .

[21]  Harry P. Hatry,et al.  Performance Measurement: Getting Results , 2007 .

[22]  Mary A. Parmelee Trends in outsourcing for water utilities , 2002 .

[23]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei: public preferences and improvement strategies. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Jeffrey W. Rogers,et al.  A financial resource allocation model for regional water systems , 2007, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[25]  Linda L. Paralez Performance Assessment in Us Water and Wastewater Utilities , 2001 .

[26]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[27]  Collective Decision Making on Locally Undesirable Land Uses , 1997 .

[28]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using Stakeholder Values to Make Smarter Environmental Decisions , 2000 .

[29]  Richard Franceys,et al.  Efficiency of Water-Supply and Sanitation Projects in Ghana , 1995 .