Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans

[1]  G. Kemerink,et al.  Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography , 2016, Emergency Radiology.

[2]  Michael G. Millin,et al.  EMS Spinal Precautions and the Use of the Long Backboard –Resource Document to the Position Statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma , 2014, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[3]  M. Bernhard,et al.  Dose effects and image quality: is there any influence by bearing devices in whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients? , 2014, Injury.

[4]  C. W. J. Oomens,et al.  A numerical study to analyse the risk for pressure ulcer development on a spine board. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  M. Hauswald.  A re-conceptualisation of acute spinal care , 2012, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  R. Johnson,et al.  Cervical spine radiology , 2011 .

[7]  C. Aktaş,et al.  Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in healthy volunteer individuals , 2011 .

[8]  M. Poeze,et al.  Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  N. Manghat,et al.  Re: A CT reconstruction artefact that mimics acute subdural haemorrhage. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[10]  S. Andronikou,et al.  The effects of misinterpretation of an artefact on multidetector row CT scans in children , 2009, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  S. Gadde,et al.  Case report. Artefact misinterpretation on CT images of the head. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[12]  M E Lovell,et al.  A repeat audit of spinal board usage in the emergency department. , 2008, Injury.

[13]  D. Braude,et al.  Diffusion of medical progress: early spinal immobilization in the emergency department. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  S. Andronikou,et al.  Multiplanar angled reconstructions of reconstructions—a dangerous practice using multidetector CT , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Initial Radiographic Evaluation of the Spine After Trauma: When, What, Where, and How to Image the Acutely Traumatized Spine , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[16]  I. Ng,et al.  Effects of Head Posture on Cerebral Hemodynamics: Its Influences on Intracranial Pressure, Cerebral Perfusion Pressure, and Cerebral Oxygenation , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[17]  R. Daffner,et al.  Pseudofractures due to Nec-Loc cervical immobilization collar , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  M. Lovell,et al.  Current spinal board usage in emergency departments across the UK. , 2003, Injury.

[19]  W. Ummenhofer,et al.  In search of the most suitable technique for truncal spinal immobilization with associated radiography , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[20]  E. Lerner,et al.  Duration of patient immobilization in the ED. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  J. Miller,et al.  Significance of backboard artifacts on portable trauma series chest radiographs , 1999, Emergency Radiology.

[22]  M. Cooke.  Use of the spinal board within the accident and emergency department. , 1998, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[23]  M. Kathol,et al.  Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Harris Js,et al.  National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. , 1975 .