Hybrid collaborative optimization based on selection strategy of initial point and adaptive relaxation

There are two problems in Collaborative optimization (CO): (1) the local optima arising from the selection of an inappropriate initial point; (2) the low efficiency and accuracy root in inappropriate relaxation factors. To solve these problems, we first develop the Latin hypercube design (LHD) to determine an initial point of optimization, and then use the non-linear programming by quadratic Lagrangian (NLPQL) to search for the global solution. The effectiveness of the initial point selection strategy is verified by three benchmark functions with some dimensions and different complexities. Then we propose the Adaptive relaxation collaborative optimization (ARCO) algorithm to solve the inconsistency between the system level and the disciplines level, and in this method, the relaxation factors are determined according to the three separated stages of CO respectively. The performance of the ARCO algorithm is compared with the standard collaborative algorithm and the constant relaxation collaborative algorithm with a typical numerical example, which indicates that the ARCO algorithm is more efficient and accurate. Finally, we propose a Hybrid collaborative optimization (HCO) approach, which integrates the selection strategy of initial point with the ARCO algorithm. The results show that HCO can achieve the global optimal solution without the initial value and it also has advantages in convergence, accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the proposed HCO approach can solve the CO problems with applications in the spindle and the speed reducer.

[1]  Zeng Sheng-kui Research on adaptive collaborative optimization method , 2009 .

[2]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  New Approximation Assisted Multi-objective collaborative Robust Optimization (new AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty , 2013 .

[3]  Li Dengwan,et al.  Study on Parameters Optimization in Numerical Machining of Stainless-steel Based on MATLAB , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing.

[4]  Wenyin Gong,et al.  DE/BBO: a hybrid differential evolution with biogeography-based optimization for global numerical optimization , 2010, Soft Comput..

[5]  Xiang Li,et al.  Geometric analysis of collaborative optimization , 2008 .

[6]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Aspects of Collaborative Optimization for Multidisciplinary Design , 2002 .

[7]  Xin Yao,et al.  Evolutionary programming made faster , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Properties of Distributed Approaches to MDO , 2000 .

[9]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  ENHANCED COLLABORATIVE OPTIMIZATION: A DECOMPOSITION-BASED METHOD FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN , 2008, DAC 2008.

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation , 1998 .

[11]  Martin Spieck,et al.  State-of-the-Art and Future Trends in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2007 .

[12]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[13]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Multidisciplinary collaborative optimization using fuzzy satisfaction degree and fuzzy sufficiency degree model , 2008, Soft Comput..

[14]  Xia Bokai Particle swarm collaborative optimization algorithm based on velocity angle , 2007 .

[15]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Multi-disciplinary design optimization and performance evaluation of a single stage transonic axial compressor , 2013 .

[16]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[17]  Min Zhao,et al.  On the development of Bi-Level Integrated System Collaborative Optimization , 2011 .

[18]  Angel-Victor DeMiguel,et al.  An analysis of collaborative optimization methods , 2000 .

[19]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Collaborative optimization with disciplinary conceptual design , 2000 .

[20]  Yuan Charles,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .

[21]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[22]  K.-S. Jeon,et al.  Efficient System Optimization Techniques through Subspace Decomposition and Response Surface Refinement , 2002 .

[23]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Soft computing in multidisciplinary aerospace design—new directions for research , 2002 .

[24]  Wei Chen,et al.  Collaborative Reliability Analysis under the Framework of Multidisciplinary Systems Design , 2005 .

[25]  Saman K. Halgamuge,et al.  Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  Liu Rui Improved multidisciplinary collaborative optimization with global stability , 2009 .

[27]  Sangook Jun,et al.  Systematic design space exploration and rearrangement of the MDO problem by using probabilistic methodology , 2012 .

[28]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Managing approximation models in collaborative optimization , 2005 .

[29]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Based Collaborative Optimization of a Tiltrotor Configuration , 2005 .

[30]  Liu Yong-xian Optimization Design of CNC Machine Tool Spindle Based on Genetic Algorithm , 2011 .