Potential of perforated exterior louvers to improve the comfort and energy performance of an office space in different climates

Fully glazed building façades often experience high solar heat gains and daylight transmission, resulting in high cooling energy consumption and visual discomfort. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of perforated exterior louvers for controlling solar heat gains through a fenestration system, providing visual comfort to the occupant and improving the energy performance of an office space in distinct climates (tropical, semiarid, humid subtropical, continental) based on integrated thermal and lighting simulations. The louvers evaluated have 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% perforations with 120 and 240 mm louver spacing. This study demonstrates the potential of perforated exterior louvers for controlling solar heat gains and daylight transmission to improve the visual comfort of the occupant and the building energy consumption. Since perforations can significantly influence office performance and occupant comfort, it is crucial for an evaluation of this type of louver to be completed in the early design stages with integrated thermal and lighting simulation tools that are able to address the complex thermal and optical properties of the louvers. Louvers with 120 mm spacing and 5%–20% perforations reduce office energy consumption by 15%–63% (depending on the city) compared with an unshaded window while meeting the visual comfort criteria (sDA300/50% between 96% and 100%, ASE4000/400h of 0% and DGPs perception class A). Additionally, the percentage of perforations and spacing of louvers significantly impact the evaluated performance criteria. CFSs fully cover the window but have evenly distributed perforations outperform shading devices with larger spacing between louvers and louvers without perforations.

[1]  Sergio Vera,et al.  A flexible and time-efficient schedule-based communication tool for integrated lighting and thermal simulations of spaces with controlled artificial lighting and complex fenestration systems , 2016 .

[2]  Andrew McNeil,et al.  A validation of a ray-tracing tool used to generate bi-directional scattering distribution functions for complex fenestration systems , 2013 .

[3]  Daniel Uribe,et al.  Optimization of a fixed exterior complex fenestration system considering visual comfort and energy performance criteria , 2017 .

[4]  J. C. Lam,et al.  Solar heat gain factors and the implications to building designs in subtropical regions , 2000 .

[5]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Comparison on solar shadings: Monitoring of the thermo-physical behaviour, assessment of the energy saving, thermal comfort, natural lighting and environmental impact , 2014 .

[6]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection , 2013 .

[7]  S. Reilly,et al.  The impact of windows on residential energy use , 1998 .

[8]  Kyle Konis,et al.  Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California , 2013 .

[9]  Andrea Giovanni Mainini,et al.  Spectral Light Transmission Measure of Metal Screens for Glass Façades and Assessment of their Shading Potential , 2014 .

[10]  Martin Vraa Nielsen,et al.  Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight , 2011 .

[11]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Daylighting and Energy Analysis of Multi-sectional Facades , 2015 .

[12]  Eric Shen,et al.  Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies , 2014 .

[13]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Evaluation of radiance's genBSDF capability to assess solar bidirectional properties of complex fenestration systems , 2015 .

[14]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Fener: A Radiance-based modelling approach to assess the thermal and daylighting performance of complex fenestration systems in office spaces , 2015 .

[15]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Occupants interaction with electric lighting and shading systems in real single-occupied offices: Results from a monitoring campaign , 2013 .

[16]  Refrigerating.  ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals , 1967 .

[17]  A. Laouadi,et al.  Optical models of complex fenestration systems , 2007 .

[18]  Lisa Heschong,et al.  Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) , 2012 .

[19]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices - Part II: Thermal comfort simulation and impact of glazing and shading properties , 2010 .

[20]  William W. Braham,et al.  An integrated energy–emergy approach to building form optimization: Use of EnergyPlus, emergy analysis and Taguchi-regression method , 2015 .

[21]  Tilmann E. Kuhn.  Solar control : A general evaluation method for facades with venetian blinds or other solar control systems , 2006 .

[22]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  An hourly-based performance comparison of an integrated micro-structural perforated shading screen with standard shading systems , 2012 .

[23]  Per Heiselberg,et al.  Control strategies for intelligent glazed façade and their influence on energy and comfort performance of office buildings in Denmark , 2015 .

[24]  Sergio Vera,et al.  An integrated thermal and lighting simulation tool to support the design process of complex fenestration systems for office buildings , 2017 .

[25]  Ayca Kirimtat,et al.  Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings , 2016 .

[26]  Sergio Vera,et al.  Solar and Lighting Transmission through Complex Fenestration Systems of Office Buildings in a Warm and Dry Climate of Chile , 2014 .

[27]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance , 2013 .

[28]  Jesus Maria Blanco,et al.  Investigating the thermal behavior of double-skin perforated sheet façades: Part A: Model characterization and validation procedure , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew McNeil,et al.  A validation of the Radiance three-phase simulation method for modelling annual daylight performance of optically complex fenestration systems , 2013 .

[30]  Laura Bellia,et al.  An Overview on Solar Shading Systems for Buildings , 2014 .

[31]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[32]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades , 2012 .

[33]  Sabine Hoffmann,et al.  Balancing daylight, glare, and energy-efficiency goals: An evaluation of exterior coplanar shading systems using complex fenestration modeling tools , 2016 .