The potential of seismic methods for detecting cavities and buried objects: experimentation at a test site

One of the recurring problems in civil engineering and landscape management is the detection of natural and man-made cavities in order to mitigate the problems of collapse and subsurface subsidence. In general, the position of the cavities is not known, either because they are not recorded in a database or because location maps are not available. In such cases, geophysical methods can provide an effective alternative for cavity detection, particularly ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and seismic methods, for which pertinent results have been recently obtained. Many studies carried out under real conditions have revealed that the signatures derived from interaction between seismic signals and voids are affected by complex geology, thus making them difficult to interpret. We decided to analyze this interaction under physical conditions as simple as possible, i.e., at a test site built specifically for that purpose. The test site was constructed of a homogeneous material and a void-equivalent body so that the ratio between wavelength and heterogeneity size was compatible with that encountered in reality. Numerical modeling was initially used to understand wave interaction with the body, prior to the design of various data-processing protocols. P-wave imagery and surface-wave sections were then acquired and processed. The work involved in this experiment and the associated results are presented, followed by a discussion concerning the reliability of such a study, and its consequences for future seismic projects.

[1]  Waymond R. Scott,et al.  A hybrid acoustic/electromagnetic technique for locating land mines , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[2]  Khalid Sbai,et al.  High resolution seismic prospection of old gypsum mines - evaluation of detection possibilities , 1996 .

[3]  Jean Virieux,et al.  SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method , 1984 .

[5]  Robert H. Stolt,et al.  Seismic migration : theory and practice , 1986 .

[6]  J. Parra,et al.  Utilization Of Interwell Seismic Logging For Formation Continuity At The Gypsy Test Site, Oklahoma , 1996 .

[7]  L. Gochioco.  Seismic surveys for coal exploration and mine planning , 1990 .

[8]  A. Benson.  Applications of ground penetrating radar in assessing some geological hazards: examples of groundwater contamination, faults, cavities , 1995 .

[9]  Jianghai Xia,et al.  Ground Roll As a Tool to Image Near-surface Anomaly , 1998 .

[10]  Jianghai Xia,et al.  Imaging dispersion curves of surface waves on multi-channel record , 1998 .

[11]  A. Bitri,et al.  Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil-engineering applications: study on a test site , 2000 .

[12]  A. Levander.  Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms , 1988 .

[13]  R. Stolt.  MIGRATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM , 1978 .

[14]  J. Sochacki.  Absorbing boundary conditions for the elastic wave equations , 1988 .

[15]  Neil L. Anderson,et al.  Reflection Seismic Mapping Of Caverns And Collapsed Caves, Carthage Missouri , 1997 .

[16]  Z. Alterman,et al.  Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite difference methods , 1968 .

[17]  C. Juhlin.  Finite‐difference elastic wave propagation in 2D heterogeneous transversely isotropic media1 , 1995 .

[18]  J. Virieux.  P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[19]  James M. Sabatier,et al.  Acoustic-to-seismic coupling and detection of landmines , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).