Using action research to develop human factors approaches to improve assembly quality during early design and ramp-up of an assembly line

Abstract Engineers at a large electronics new product initiation site were interested in developing human factors (HF) approaches to help improve assembly quality during two stages of their production assembly design: early design of tasks, fixtures and tooling; and during early ramp-up of new assembly lines at outsourcing sites. Researchers worked in an action research approach with company engineers and ergonomists to integrate HF into both design stages. This paper presents the human factors approaches and discusses the challenges of using human factors to improve assembly quality. For the first stage of early design, a HF-design for assembly (HF-DFA) scorecard was developed with 22 items scored on a 0 (no risk or problem) to 2 (high risk or problems) scale. Items included physical risks, such as grip size and force, movement risks, such as re-grasping or re-orienting, visual risks, such as visual accuracy and inspection difficulty, and cognitive issues such as ability to detect a problem and risk of damage to part or component. High scores were associated with assembly tasks that were both reported as difficult by operators, and also had quality problems. The HF-DFA was adopted as a controlled engineering document and used to proactively score assembly tasks prior to final design of tasks, fixtures and tooling. In the second stage of early ramp, researchers combined the HF-DFA and other HF and performance-based metrics into a modified HF-house of quality (HF-HoQ) approach where the focus was on “worker” requirements rather than the traditional customer requirements. The HF-HoQ was evaluated using video of four identical tasks performed at different outsourcing locations that had a seven-fold difference in defect rates. The HF-HoQ successfully detected the site with the highest defect rate, but not the lowest. The authors recommend further testing and development of approaches that attempt to bring insight from HF to the issue of improving assembly quality. Relevance to industry Human factors is broader than injury prevention, and has been linked to assembly quality. Two HF approaches were developed to help improve quality in early design stages and during early ramp-up of assembly lines. Companies are encouraged to develop and evaluate HF approaches for improving assembly quality.

[1]  J A Eklund,et al.  Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  J Village,et al.  An ergonomics action research demonstration: integrating human factors into assembly design processes , 2014, Ergonomics.

[3]  J Eklund,et al.  Ergonomics, quality and continuous improvement--conceptual and empirical relationships in an industrial context. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[4]  Filippo A. Salustri,et al.  Adapting Engineering Design Tools to Include Human Factors , 2014 .

[5]  ZareMohsen,et al.  Does Ergonomics Improve Product Quality and Reduce Costs? A Review Article , 2016 .

[6]  J. Dul,et al.  Human factors: spanning the gap between OM and HRM , 2010 .

[7]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  The impact of poor assembly ergonomics on product quality: A cost-benefit analysis in car manufacturing: Poor Assembly Ergonomics and Product Quality , 2010 .

[8]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1996 Ergonomics and the quality movement , 1997 .

[9]  Belarmino Adenso-Díaz,et al.  Ergonomic performance and quality relationship: an empirical evidence case , 2003 .

[10]  W. Patrick Neumann,et al.  The Relative Role of Safety and Productivity in Canadian Ergonomists’ Professional Practices , 2013 .

[11]  W. Patrick Neumann,et al.  Integrating human factors into discrete event simulation: a proactive approach to simultaneously design for system performance and employees’ well being , 2016 .

[12]  A. Garg,et al.  The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  Cory Searcy,et al.  Design for human factors (DfHF): a grounded theory for integrating human factors into production design processes , 2015, Ergonomics.

[14]  S S Ulin,et al.  Development and evaluation of an observational method for assessing repetition in hand tasks. , 1997, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[15]  J Village,et al.  Ergonomics action research II: a framework for integrating HF into work system design , 2012, Ergonomics.

[16]  Ozalp Vayvay,et al.  Ergonomics interventions improve quality in manufacturing: a case study , 2008 .

[17]  Mohsen Zare,et al.  Does Ergonomics Improve Product Quality and Reduce Costs? A Review Article , 2016 .

[18]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  What are the obstacles and needs of proactive ergonomics measures at early product development stages? – An interview study in five Swedish companies , 2012 .

[19]  Richard Wells,et al.  Production quality and human factors engineering: A systematic review and theoretical framework. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Peter Buckle,et al.  ‘The perfect is the enemy of the good’ – ergonomics research and practice.Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors Annual Lecture 2010 , 2011, Ergonomics.

[21]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[22]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  The impact of poor assembly ergonomics on product quality: A cost–benefit analysis in car manufacturing , 2010 .

[24]  Ozalp Vayvay,et al.  Quality improvement through ergonomics methodology: conceptual framework and an application , 2008 .