Feeder load balancing in MV distribution networks using soft normally-open points

Soft Normally-Open Points (SNOPs) are power electronic devices installed at normally-open points in a distribution network. Such power-electronic devices are able to control power flow to balance loads between feeders, reduce network losses and regulate voltage. The performance of SNOPs for feeder load balancing in a medium voltage distribution network was investigated. Steady state models of two different types of SNOP were developed: a back to back voltage-source converter and unified power flow controller. The benefits of using SNOPs were quantified by solving a combinational nonlinear optimization using Powell's direct set method. The IEEE 33-bus power system was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of SNOPs. Different numbers and types of SNOP devices were considered. The superiority of using SNOP was shown by comparing them with the conventional network reconfiguration.

[1]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Network Reconfiguration in Distribution Systems for Loss Reduction and Load Balancing , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  Timothy C. Green,et al.  Increasing distributed generation penetration using soft normally-open points , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[3]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Sequential minimax search for a maximum , 1953 .

[4]  Lambros Ekonomou,et al.  Application of powell's optimisation method for the optimal number of wind turbines in a wind farm , 2011 .

[5]  Pin Han,et al.  Powell's method for designing optical multilayer thin-film filters , 2010, OECC 2010 Technical Digest.

[6]  Adi Botea,et al.  Optimal Reconfiguration for Supply Restoration With Informed A$^{\ast}$ Search , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  M. E. Baran,et al.  Optimal sizing of capacitors placed on a radial distribution system , 1989 .

[8]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control , 1997 .

[9]  A. Kechroud,et al.  Taking the experience from Flexible AC Transmission Systems to flexible AC distribution systems , 2007, 2007 42nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference.

[10]  J. Mutale,et al.  Transmission network reinforcement versus FACTS: an economic assessment , 1999, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications. Connecting Utilities. PICA 99. To the Millennium and Beyond (Cat. No.99CH36351).

[11]  G. B. Jasmon,et al.  Network reconfiguration for load balancing in distribution networks , 1999 .

[12]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives , 1964, Comput. J..

[13]  T. C. Green,et al.  Benefits of Distribution-Level Power Electronics for Supporting Distributed Generation Growth , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[14]  Timothy C. Green,et al.  Increasing photovoltaic penetration with local energy storage and soft normally-open points , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[15]  R. Belmans,et al.  Minimization of steady-state losses in meshed networks using VSC HVDC , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.